This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McMahon, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Pickering, L. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McMahon, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Pickering, L. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice

PEDIATRICS Vol. 111 No. 4 April 2003, pp. e299-e303


ELECTRONIC ARTICLE

Comparison of E-mail, Fax, and Postal Surveys of Pediatricians

Shawn R. McMahon, MD, MPH*, Martha Iwamoto, MD, MPH{ddagger}, Mehran S. Massoudi, PhD, MPH§, Hussain R. Yusuf, MBBS, MPH§, John M. Stevenson, MA§, Felicita David, MS§, Susan Y. Chu, PhD, MSPH§ and Larry K. Pickering, MD§

* Epidemic Intelligence Service, Division of Applied Public Health Training, Epidemiology Program Office, assigned to National Immunization Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
{ddagger} Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia
§ Immunization Services Division, National Immunization Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia

--> Objectives. To compare 3 communication modes (postal, fax, and e-mail) in a rotavirus vaccine physician survey.

Methods. We used 3 communication modes to distribute a survey to physicians listed in the membership directory of the Georgia Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics. The directory listed 1391 members; however, 404 were deemed ineligible on the basis of their listing as a specialist, retiree, resident in training, or government public health employee. Of the 987 members expected to administer vaccines, 150 were selected randomly to receive the postal survey (postal group). Of the remaining listings, 488 (58%) of 837 listed a fax number; 150 members were selected randomly and faxed a survey (fax group). Of the remaining members, 266 (39%) of 687 had e-mail addresses listed; 150 members were selected randomly for the e-mail survey (e-mail group). A follow-up survey was sent by the same mode at 2 weeks. A final survey was sent via another mode (mixed mode) at 1 month: by fax to e-mail and postal nonresponders and by post to fax nonresponders and those without fax.

Results. Eligible respondents in the 3 survey groups were similar in their practice setting and location. Although the e-mail group had fewer median years (8 years) since medical school graduation than the fax group (19 years) and postal group (17 years), a similar percentage of responders in all groups had computers (>85%) and Internet access (>=70%) at work. However, only 39% of members listed an e-mail address in the directory. In the 2 weeks after the first mailing, 39 surveys were completed via postal mail, 50 via fax, and 16 via e-mail. In the 2 weeks after the second contact (sent at 2 weeks), 20 surveys were completed via postal mail, 15 via fax, and 17 via e-mail. The response rate after the first 2 mailings was 41% (59 of 143) for postal, 47% (65 of 137) for fax, and 26% (33 of 125) for e-mail surveys. The third and final survey (sent 1 month after the first mailing) was sent by a different (ie, mixed) mode and elicited an additional 73 responses: 19 responses (15 postal, 4 fax) from the postal group, 19 responses (18 postal, 1 fax) from the fax group, and 35 responses (15 postal, 13 fax, 7 e-mail) from the e-mail group. Twenty-three percent (9 of 40) of the e-mail and 18% (15 of 83) of the fax surveys completed were returned on the same or subsequent day they were sent, compared with none of the postal surveys. There were significant differences among the 3 groups for invalid addresses/numbers (4% postal, 8% fax, and 16% e-mail) listed in the directory. Using mixed modes as the third contact, the overall response rate increased from 39% before mixed mode to a final of 53%. On the basis of the 3 initial groups, responses to 1 of 12 rotavirus questions differed significantly.

Conclusions. Future use of e-mail surveys in selected circumstances is promising, because the majority of providers have Internet access and acknowledged interest in participating in e-mail surveys. E-mail surveys could be especially useful if rapid response time is necessary. There were fewer incomplete questions by participants who completed the e-mail survey compared with postal or fax participants. Updating membership e-mail addresses and routinely using e-mail as a communication tool should improve the ability to use e-mail surveys. There may need to be ongoing evaluations that critically evaluate providers’ responses to e-mail surveys compared with other survey modes before e-mail surveys can become a standard survey tool. In the meantime, mixed-mode surveys may be an option.

Abbreviations: AAP, American Academy of Pediatrics


Received for publication Jun 21, 2002; Accepted Dec 2, 2002.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JPEN J Parenter Enteral NutrHome page
A. S. Behara, S. J. Peterson, Y. Chen, J. Butsch, O. Lateef, and S. Komanduri
Nutrition Support in the Critically Ill: A Physician Survey
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, March 1, 2008; 32(2): 113 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
L. A. Crane, M. F. Daley, J. Barrow, C. Babbel, B. L. Beaty, J. F. Steiner, A. Kempe, L. Miriam Dickinson, and S. Stokley
Sentinel Physician Networks as a Technique for Rapid Immunization Policy Surveys
Eval Health Prof, March 1, 2008; 31(1): 43 - 64.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
cfpHome page
N. Kennie, B. Watson, and K. Iglar
Cardiovascular risk assessment in family practice: A practice-based tool
Can Fam Physician, January 1, 2008; 54(1): 34 - 35.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
J. B. VanGeest, T. P. Johnson, and V. L. Welch
Methodologies for Improving Response Rates in Surveys of Physicians: A Systematic Review
Eval Health Prof, December 1, 2007; 30(4): 303 - 321.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. L. Bailey, L. G. Glance, M. P. Eaton, B. Parshall, and S. McIntosh
A Survey of the Use of Ultrasound During Central Venous Catheterization
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2007; 104(3): 491 - 497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Vertinsky and B. Forster
Prevalence of Eye Strain Among Radiologists: Influence of Viewing Variables on Symptoms
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 681 - 686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]