This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (40)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schoen, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by To, T. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schoen, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by To, T. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Premature & Newborn
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

PEDIATRICS Vol. 110 No. 4 October 2002, pp. 781-786

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Universal Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Newborn Screening

Edgar J. Schoen, MD*, John C. Baker, MD*, Christopher J. Colby, PhD{ddagger} and Trinh T. To, BS*

* Department of Genetics, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Oakland, California
{ddagger} Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Oakland, California

--> Objective. To estimate potential costs and benefits of routinely using tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) to screen newborns for inborn errors of metabolism.

Method. Analysis of costs and benefits resulting from use of MS/MS in screening of 32 000 newborn infants using data from the Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program of Northern California plus other published data.

Setting. A large health maintenance organization.

Results. In the base scenario, the cost per quality-adjusted life year saved by MS/MS screening was $5827; in the least favorable scenario, this cost was $11 419, and in the most favorable scenario, $736.

Conclusion. Costs per quality-adjusted life year saved by MS/MS screening for inborn errors of metabolism compare favorably with other mass screening programs, including those for breast and prostate cancer.

Key Words: costs and cost analysis • homocystinuria • maple syrup urine disease • metabolism • inborn errors • neonatal screening, • spectrum analysis • mass

Abbreviations: MS/MS, tandem mass spectrometry • IEM, inborn errors of metabolism • NBS, newborn screening • KP, Kaiser Permanente • PKU, phenylketonuria • MSUD, maple syrup urine disease • MMA, methylmalonic acidemia • PPA, propionic acidemia • MCAD, medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency • QALY, quality-adjusted years of life


Received for publication Jan 25, 2002; Accepted Jun 19, 2002.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
R. Norman, M. Haas, M. Chaplin, P. Joy, and B. Wilcken
Economic Evaluation of Tandem Mass Spectrometry Newborn Screening in Australia
Pediatrics, February 1, 2009; 123(2): 451 - 457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
P. J. Neumann, P. D. Jacobson, and J. A. Palmer
Measuring the Value of Public Health Systems: The Disconnect Between Health Economists and Public Health Practitioners
Am J Public Health, December 1, 2008; 98(12): 2173 - 2180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Policy Politics Nursing PracticeHome page
H. Bishop Hubbard
Policy Issues Related to Expanded Newborn Screening: A Review of Three Genetic/Metabolic Disorders
Policy Politics Nursing Practice, August 1, 2007; 8(3): 201 - 209.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
W. B. Hanley
False-positive Results in Expanded Newborn Screening
Pediatrics, February 1, 2007; 119(2): 414 - 415.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
C. I. Kaye and Committee on Genetics
Introduction to the Newborn Screening Fact Sheets
Pediatrics, September 1, 2006; 118(3): 1304 - 1312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
K. Johnson, M. A. Lloyd-Puryear, M. Y. Mann, L. R. Ramos, and B. L. Therrell
Financing State Newborn Screening Programs: Sources and Uses of Funds
Pediatrics, May 1, 2006; 117(5/S1): S270 - S279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. R. Botkin
Research for Newborn Screening: Developing a National Framework
Pediatrics, October 1, 2005; 116(4): 862 - 871.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
I. Griebsch, J. Coast, and J. Brown
Quality-Adjusted Life-Years Lack Quality in Pediatric Care: A Critical Review of Published Cost-Utility Studies in Child Health
Pediatrics, May 1, 2005; 115(5): e600 - e614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
N. A. Holtzman
Management of Hyperbilirubinemia: Quality of Evidence and Cost
Pediatrics, October 1, 2004; 114(4): 1086 - 1088.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. E. Waisbren, S. Albers, S. Amato, M. Ampola, T. G. Brewster, L. Demmer, R. B. Eaton, R. Greenstein, M. Korson, C. Larson, et al.
Effect of Expanded Newborn Screening for Biochemical Genetic Disorders on Child Outcomes and Parental Stress
JAMA, November 19, 2003; 290(19): 2564 - 2572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
N. A. Holtzman
Expanding Newborn Screening: How Good Is the Evidence?
JAMA, November 19, 2003; 290(19): 2606 - 2608.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
L. N. Venditti, C. P. Venditti, G. T. Berry, P. B. Kaplan, E. M. Kaye, H. Glick, and C. A. Stanley
Newborn Screening by Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Medium-Chain Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Deficiency: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Pediatrics, November 1, 2003; 112(5): 1005 - 1015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]