This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elder, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elder, J. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Genitourinary Tract
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

PEDIATRICS Vol. 110 No. 4 October 2002, pp. 748-751

Ultrasonography Is Unnecessary in Evaluating Boys With a Nonpalpable Testis

Jack S. Elder, MD

From the Division of Pediatric Urology, Rainbow Babies and Children’s Hospital, Department of Urology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio

--> Objective. An inguinal sonogram often is obtained in boys with a nonpalpable testis to "localize" the testis, ie, determine whether the testis is present. The results of ultrasonography in boys with a nonpalpable testis were analyzed.

Methods. The records of boys who were referred to a pediatric urology center with a diagnosis of nonpalpable testis and who had undergone inguinal sonography were reviewed. The results of sonography were compared with findings in the office as well as surgical findings.

Results. A total of 62 boys who were referred with a diagnosis of a nonpalpable testis and who had undergone a sonogram were reviewed. The sonogram was ordered by the primary care physician in 51 boys (82%) and by a general urologist in 11 cases (18%). The testis was identified by sonography in 12 (18%) of 66 cases, and all were localized to the inguinal canal. Physical examination by a pediatric urologist showed that 6 were in the scrotum and 6 were in the inguinal canal or perineum. Of the 54 testes that were not localized by the sonogram, 33 (61%) were palpable and 21 (39%) were nonpalpable. Of the truly nonpalpable testes, laparoscopy and abdominal/inguinal exploration identified the testis as abdominal in 10 cases and atrophic secondary to spermatic cord torsion in 11 cases.

Conclusion. Sonography is unnecessary in boys with a nonpalpable testis, because it rarely if ever localizes a true nonpalpable testis, and it does not alter the surgical approach in these patients.

Key Words: testis • undescended • ultrasonography • testis • nonpalpable • radiology

Abbreviations: CT, computerized tomography • MRI, magnetic resonance imaging

Received for publication Oct 22, 2001; Accepted Mar 25, 2002.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Trop DoctHome page
I. S. Mir, M. Mohsin, O. Kirmani, B. A Cheachek, I. Alam, and M. Wani
Is laparoscospic orchidectomy the treatment of choice in adults with impalpable testis in rural hospitals in the developing world?
Trop Doct, January 1, 2009; 39(1): 12 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]