From the Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Rainbow Babies and Childrens Hospital of the University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
--> Objective. This study was designed to test whether rotation of antibiotics can reduce colonization with resistant Gram-negative bacilli in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).
Methods. A monthly rotation of gentamicin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and ceftazidime was compared with unrestricted antibiotic use in side-by-side NICU populations (rotation team vs control team). Pharyngeal and rectal samples were obtained 3 times a week and tested for Gram-negative bacilli resistant to each of the rotation antibiotics. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis determined the numbers of genetically discordant resistant organisms on each team. The association between colonization with a resistant bacillus (the primary outcome) and team assignment was tested.
Results. A total of 1062 infants were studied during a 1-year period. A total of 10.7% infants on the rotation team versus 7.7% on the control team were colonized with a resistant bacillus. No interteam differences were distinguishable when the numbers of genetically discordant resistant organisms were normalized to the total number of team admissions. The incidence of nosocomial infection and mortality also were similar across teams.
Conclusion. These data indicate that rotation of parenteral antibiotics according to the applied protocol has no detectable effect in decreasing the reservoir of resistant Gram-negative bacilli in a tertiary-care NICU.
Key Words: antibiotic resistance Gram-negative bacilli neonatal intensive care antibiotic utilization colonization pulsed-field gel electrophoresis
Abbreviations: NICU, neonatal intensive care unit PFGE, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D Isaacs Unnatural selection: reducing antibiotic resistance in neonatal units Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., January 1, 2006; 91(1): F72 - F74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Brown and D. Nathwani Antibiotic cycling or rotation: a systematic review of the evidence of efficacy J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2005; 55(1): 6 - 9. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Masterton Antibiotic cycling: more than it might seem? J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2005; 55(1): 1 - 5. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. T. Bergstrom, M. Lo, and M. Lipsitch From The Cover: Ecological theory suggests that antimicrobial cycling will not reduce antimicrobial resistance in hospitals PNAS, September 7, 2004; 101(36): 13285 - 13290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||