PEDIATRICS Vol. 110 No. 3 September 2002, pp. e36
ELECTRONIC ARTICLE |
Factors Associated With HIV Testing Among HIV-Positive and HIV-Negative High-Risk Adolescents: The REACH Study


* Health Risk Reduction Projects, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, Los Angeles, California
Westat, Inc, Rockville, Maryland
Department of Epidemiology and International Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
|| Adolescent AIDS Program, Department of Pediatrics, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
--> Objective. To describe human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing patterns among high-risk, uninfected adolescents and HIV-infected adolescents, and factors associated with testing.
Methods. HIV-infected adolescents (N = 246) and high-risk, uninfected adolescents (N = 141) at 15 sites nationwide were asked about the number of times they were tested for HIV, the type of agency at which testing occurred, and reasons for testing.
Results. The majority of participants reported being influenced to obtain testing by health care providers (53.1% of the HIV-infected group and 66.1% of the HIV-uninfected group, respectively). Female participants were somewhat more likely to have used a confidential or anonymous site for the most recent test, compared with male participants (73.5% and 67.5%, respectively). Among the HIV-infected group, feeling sick was the only factor associated with number of tests. Among the HIV-uninfected group, having more male partners, marijuana use in the past 3 months, white race, and having had same-gender partners in their lifetime (males only) were associated with number of tests. Multivariate analyses identified 2 significant models. Modeling the probability of having been tested 3 or more times, black participants were less likely to be tested than white participants (odds ratio [OR] = 0.4), and participants who felt sick were more likely to be tested than those who did not (OR = 1.7). Modeling the probability that the last test would be positive, black participants were more likely than white participants to test positive (OR = 2.3); those who were tested because they thought they might have gotten HIV from sex (OR = 3.0) or they felt sick (OR = 3.9) were more likely to test positive; participants who were tested because a health care professional recommended it were actually less likely (OR = 0.5) to test positive.
Conclusions. Overall, these findings highlight the importance of making HIV testing more routinely available to sexually active adolescents. More work needs to be done to normalize HIV testing among adolescents, and more innovative approaches need to be implemented on a wide scale.
Key Words: HIV HIV testing adolescence comparative study risk-taking
Abbreviations: HIV, human immunodeficiency virus STI, sexually transmitted infection REACH, Reaching for Excellence in Adolescent Care and Health SD, standard deviation ACASI, audio computer assisted self-administered interview OR, odds ratio
Received for publication Aug 3, 2001; Accepted May 29, 2002.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. M. Obermeyer and M. Osborn The Utilization of Testing and Counseling for HIV: A Review of the Social and Behavioral Evidence Am J Public Health, October 1, 2007; 97(10): 1762 - 1774. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





