This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scolnik, D.
Right arrow Articles by Young, N. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scolnik, D.
Right arrow Articles by Young, N. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Therapeutics & Toxicology
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

PEDIATRICS Vol. 110 No. 3 September 2002, pp. 553-556

Comparison of Oral Versus Normal and High-Dose Rectal Acetaminophen in the Treatment of Febrile Children

Dennis Scolnik, FRCPC*,{ddagger}, Eran Kozer, MD*,{ddagger}, Sheila Jacobson, FRCPC§, Shelley Diamond, BSc (Pharm)|| and Nancy L. Young, PhD

* Division of Emergency Services
{ddagger} Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology
§ Pediatric Medicine
|| Pharmacy
Community Health Systems Resource Group, the Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

--> Objectives. To compare the defervescent effect of high-dose rectal suppository acetaminophen with the recommended oral and rectal dosages and to evaluate acceptability of rectal acetaminophen.

Methods. A randomized, controlled trial was performed in 70 patients aged 6 months to 6 years with fever >=39°C. Group A received rectal acetaminophen 15 mg/kg, group B received rectal acetaminophen 30 mg/kg, and group C received oral acetaminophen 15 mg/kg. Primary outcome was maximal change in temperature during the 3-hour study period after initial treatment.

Results. There were 24 patients in group A, 23 in group B, and 23 in group C. There was no significant difference in temperature change between the groups during the 3 hours or in the maximum drop in temperature or final temperature. Visual analog scores for satisfaction of parents did not reveal any significant differences between the oral and rectal routes.

Conclusions. There was no difference between the temperature decrement in patients treated with 15 mg/kg oral acetaminophen and the same or double dose rectally. Thus, there seems to be no evidence to support the use of higher doses of rectal acetaminophen for the treatment of fever in children. The rectal route proved to be as acceptable as the oral among parents.

Key Words: acetaminophen • fever • rectal • dose

Received for publication Jan 30, 2002; Accepted May 22, 2002.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
L. H. Goldstein, M. Berlin, M. Berkovitch, and E. Kozer
Effectiveness of Oral vs Rectal Acetaminophen: A Meta-analysis
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, November 1, 2008; 162(11): 1042 - 1046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JWatch Emergency Med.Home page
Oral and Rectal Acetaminophen Equally Effective for Fever Reduction
Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, November 13, 2002; 2002(1113): 10 - 10.
[Full Text]