This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (24)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carbajal, R.
Right arrow Articles by Paupe, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carbajal, R.
Right arrow Articles by Paupe, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Premature & Newborn
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
PEDIATRICS Vol. 110 No. 2 August 2002, pp. 389-393

Crossover Trial of Analgesic Efficacy of Glucose and Pacifier in Very Preterm Neonates During Subcutaneous Injections

Ricardo Carbajal, MD, Richard Lenclen, MD, Vincent Gajdos, MD, Myriam Jugie, MD and Alain Paupe, MD

From the Poissy Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Poissy-Saint Germain Hospital, Poissy, France

Objective. Very preterm newborns undergo multiple invasive procedures. Nonpharmacological interventions are valuable alternatives for pain relief during minor procedures in neonates. Oral sucrose analgesia has been widely studied in term and preterm neonates during painful procedures. The analgesic effect of oral glucose in very preterm infants has not yet been reported. The objectives of this study were to assess the analgesic effect of orally administered glucose and to determine the synergetic analgesic effect of glucose and pacifiers during subcutaneous injections in very preterm neonates using a validated behavioral acute pain rating scale.

Design. Two crossover trials.

Setting. One neonatal intensive care unit in a community-based general hospital.

Methods. A prospective study was conducted in 40 very preterm neonates. Each infant received 2 treatments in a crossover manner during 2 consecutive subcutaneous injections of erythropoietin. The first trial (25 infants) was intended to compare oral 30% glucose (0.3 mL) versus placebo (0.3 mL of sterile water); the second trial (15 infants) compared oral 30% glucose (0.3 mL) versus oral 30% glucose (0.3 mL) followed by sucking a pacifier. The primary outcome measure was the evaluation of pain induced by a subcutaneous injection of erythropoietin, using Douleur Aiguë Nouveau-né scale (0 no pain, 10 maximum pain).

Results. Twenty-four infants completed the study in the first trial and 15 in the second one. Mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) gestational age, birth weight, postnatal age, and weight at inclusion for neonates in the first and second trial were, respectively, 28.1 (95% CI: 27.3–29.0) and 29.1 (95% CI: 27.8–30.4) weeks, 1036 (95% CI: 944-1128) and 995 (95% CI: 848-1141) g, 26.4 (95% CI: 22.4–30.3) and 26 (95% CI: 22.0–29.9) days, and 1234 (95% CI: 1120–1348) and 1209 (95% CI: 1059–1359) g. In the first trial, median (interquartile) pain scores for placebo and 30% glucose, respectively, were 7 (2.5–9.75) and 4.5 (1–6). In the second trial, median (interquartile) pain scores for 30% glucose and for 30% glucose plus pacifier, respectively, were 4 (2–7) and 4 (1–6).

Conclusions. A small dose of 0.3 mL of 30% oral glucose has an analgesic effect in very preterm neonates during subcutaneous injections. This effect is clinically evident because it can be detected by a behavioral pain rating scale. The synergetic analgesic effect of glucose plus sucking a pacifier is less obvious in very preterm neonates as opposed to what other studies have showed in full-term infants.

Key Words: pain • preterm • neonate • glucose • pacifier

Abbreviations: NICU, neonatal intensive care unit • DAN, Douleur Aiguë Nouveau-né


Received for publication Aug 11, 2001; Accepted Mar 3, 2002.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Evid Based Complement Alternat MedHome page
J. C. I. Tsao, S. Evans, M. Meldrum, T. Altman, and L. K. Zeltzer
A Review of CAM for Procedural Pain in Infancy: Part I. Sucrose and Non-nutritive Sucking
Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med., December 1, 2008; 5(4): 371 - 381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Fetus and Newborn and Section on Surg, Canadian Paediatric Society, and Fetus and Newborn Committee
Prevention and Management of Pain in the Neonate: An Update
Pediatrics, November 1, 2006; 118(5): 2231 - 2241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
L. Lefrak, K. Burch, R. Caravantes, K. Knoerlein, N. DeNolf, J. Duncan, F. Hampton, C. Johnston, D. Lockey, C. M.-W. RN, et al.
Sucrose Analgesia: Identifying Potentially Better Practices
Pediatrics, November 1, 2006; 118(Supplement_2): S197 - S202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
M. Gradin and J. Schollin
The Role of Endogenous Opioids in Mediating Pain Reduction by Orally Administered Glucose Among Newborns
Pediatrics, April 1, 2005; 115(4): 1004 - 1007.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
P J Mathew and J L Mathew
Assessment and management of pain in infants
Postgrad. Med. J., August 1, 2003; 79(934): 438 - 443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Nurs.Home page
OTHER ARTICLES NOTED (Nov 01 to 18 Oct 02)
Evid. Based Nurs., January 1, 2003; 6(1): e1 - 1.
[Full Text] [PDF]