This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rascher, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rascher, W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Therapeutics & Toxicology
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
PEDIATRICS Vol. 110 No. 2 August 2002, pp. 254-257

Survey of Adverse Drug Reactions on a Pediatric Ward: A Strategy for Early and Detailed Detection

Jutta Weiss, MD*, Sabine Krebs, RPh{ddagger}, Claudia Hoffmann, MD{ddagger}, Ulrike Werner, RPh{ddagger}, Antje Neubert, RPh{ddagger}, Kay Brune, MD{ddagger} and Wolfgang Rascher, MD*

* Department of Pediatrics, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
{ddagger} Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Erlangen, Germany

Objective. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occur frequently in children. However, the exact incidence of ADRs is unknown. Therefore, we studied ADRs in 1 ward and assessed whether a general approach, eg, by a computerized monitoring system, to detect ADRs in children is feasible and likely to yield a higher rate of early detected ADRs. The aim was to assess the usefulness of a computerized monitoring system before implementing costly adaptations.

Methods. An 8-month prospective study was conducted at a 10-bed pediatric isolation ward of the University Hospital. Charts were reviewed once weekly by a pharmacoepidemiological team. Clinical signs as well as laboratory changes were documented and assessed. Algorithms were used to assess the probability and severity of each detected event.

Results. All 214 patients admitted were enrolled in the study. A total of 68 ADRs were detected in 46 of 214 patients by the pharmacoepidemiological team. Thirty-four ADRs (50%) were detected by the staff physician, and 27 (40%) were detected primarily by analyzing laboratory parameters. Antibiotics-associated ADRs (50%) predominated, followed by glucocorticoids (16%), tuberculostatic (4%), and immunosuppressive agents (4%). In 5 cases, an ADR was responsible for the prolongation of hospital stay, and in 4 children, the ADR was responsible for hospitalization.

Conclusions. The detection rate of ADRs would almost be doubled by a computerized monitoring system analyzing laboratory data. Implementation of a computer monitor system that automatically generates laboratory signals may help to identify ADRs in children, and to reduce morbidity and hospital stay, as well as costs.

Key Words: children • adverse drug reaction • hospital pharmacoepidemiology • computer monitoring • off-label • unlicensed

Abbreviations: ADR, adverse drug reaction • WHO, World Health Organization • ADE, adverse drug event


Received for publication Aug 14, 2001; Accepted Feb 26, 2002.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
A Clavenna and M Bonati
Adverse drug reactions in childhood: a review of prospective studies and safety alerts
Arch. Dis. Child., September 1, 2009; 94(9): 724 - 728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
K A Oshikoya, I O Senbanjo, and O F Njokanma
Parental reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions in children in Lagos, Nigeria
Arch. Dis. Child., June 1, 2009; 94(6): 469 - 473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
G. S. Takata, C. K. Taketomo, S. Waite, and for the California Pediatric Patient Safety Initia
Characteristics of medication errors and adverse drug events in hospitals participating in the California Pediatric Patient Safety Initiative
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., November 1, 2008; 65(21): 2036 - 2044.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
G. S. Takata, W. Mason, C. Taketomo, T. Logsdon, and P. J. Sharek
Development, Testing, and Findings of a Pediatric-Focused Trigger Tool to Identify Medication-Related Harm in US Children's Hospitals
Pediatrics, April 1, 2008; 121(4): e927 - e935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. Le, T. Nguyen, A. V. Law, and J. Hodding
Adverse Drug Reactions Among Children Over a 10-Year Period
Pediatrics, August 1, 2006; 118(2): 555 - 562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]