This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Quinn, D.
Right arrow Articles by Clyman, R. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Quinn, D.
Right arrow Articles by Clyman, R. I.
Related Collections
Right arrow Heart & Blood Vessels
Right arrowRelated AAP Red Book topics:
Yersinia enterocolitica and...
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
PEDIATRICS Vol. 110 No. 1 July 2002, pp. e10-e10


ELECTRONIC ARTICLE

Factors Associated With Permanent Closure of the Ductus Arteriosus: A Role for Prolonged Indomethacin Therapy

Dolores Quinn, RN, Bruce Cooper, PhD and Ronald I. Clyman, MD

From the Cardiovascular Research Institute, Departments of Pediatrics and Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, California, and the California School of Professional Psychology, Alameda, California

Background. The most important factor determining anatomic remodeling and permanent closure of the ductus arteriosus is the degree of ductus constriction after indomethacin treatment. Muscular constriction produces a region of ischemic hypoxia in the middle of the ductus muscle media that initiates the process of permanent closure. Previous studies have shown that infants delivered before 28 weeks’ gestation, who still have evidence of ductus flow on Doppler examination (performed after the standard 3-dose course of indomethacin), have a high likelihood (>85% chance) of reopening their ductus in the future. In contrast, if there is no evidence of luminal patency on the posttreatment Doppler examination, the incidence of ductus reopening is <20%.

In the following study, we examined infants who still had a patent ductus on Doppler examination after a 3-dose course of indomethacin, to identify which factors might be associated with permanent ductus closure. We hypothesized that infants who received additional doses of indomethacin after the standard 3-dose course might develop an even tighter degree of ductus constriction and increase their chance of developing permanent closure.

Methods. We performed a retrospective cohort study of preterm infants (≤26Formula; weeks’ gestation) who were treated with indomethacin. Between 12 and 24 hours after the third dose of indomethacin, infants were examined for the presence or absence of ductus-related signs, and an echocardiogram was performed. Infants responded to the initial 3 doses of indomethacin in 1 of 3 ways: 1) the ductus was closed clinically (absent clinical signs) with no evidence of luminal flow on Doppler examination ("clinically closed"; n = 214); 2) the ductus was closed clinically, but a small amount of left-to-right luminal flow was evident on Doppler examination ("partially closed"; n = 69); 3) or the ductus was open clinically and echocardiographically ("nonresponder"; n = 30). Nonresponders underwent surgical ligation (n = 30). Infants with a partially closed ductus formed our study population.

We used a hierarchical regression model to identify which, if any, of the following factors might be associated with permanent anatomic closure in the 69 infants with a partially closed ductus: 1) gestational age, 2) exposure to antenatal steroids, 3) birth weight, 4) sex, 5) presence and severity of respiratory distress, 6) fluid administration during the first 96 hours after birth, 7) indomethacin treatment approach (prophylactic vs symptomatic), 8) year of birth, 9) use of surfactant, 10) preeclampsia, 11) chorioamnionitis, 12) bacterial septicemia, 13) necrotizing enterocolitis, or 14) duration of indomethacin treatment (standard 3-dose course vs prolonged 6-dose course). Infants who received the standard 3-dose course of indomethacin treatment were given 0.2, 0.1, and 0.1 mg/kg indomethacin during a 48-hour period. Infants who received the prolonged 6-dose course of indomethacin treatment were given a fourth, fifth, and sixth dose of 0.1 mg/kg at 24 hour-intervals, starting 24 hours after the third dose.

Results. Sixty-eight of the 69 infants survived long enough to complete all of the study evaluations. Seventy-five percent (51/68) reopened their ductus and became symptomatic; 71% (48/68) were eventually ligated. Only gestational age and duration of indomethacin treatment were significantly and independently associated with permanent closure. A prolonged 6-dose course of indomethacin was more likely than the standard 3-dose course to be associated with an increased incidence of echocardiographic closure, a decreased incidence of symptomatic reopening (odds ratio: 0.19; 95% confidence interval: 0.04–0.96), and a decreased incidence of ductus ligation (odds ratio: 0.14; 95% confidence interval: 0.03–0.68).

Discussion. Several older studies have suggested that a longer initial course of indomethacin therapy may be more effective in producing permanent ductus closure than the standard 3-dose course. In contrast, more recent studies have found that a longer course of indomethacin is no more effective than the standard 3-dose course in producing permanent closure. We hypothesize that the different outcomes among these studies may be attributable to differences in the degree of ductus constriction during the standard 3-dose course of indomethacin. Both the increased use of antenatal steroids and the earlier use of indomethacin has increased the effectiveness of the standard 3-dose course of indomethacin in recent years. We hypothesize that, in contrast with earlier studies, a significant proportion of the infants in the recent studies may have developed complete Doppler closure with just 3 doses of indomethacin (as occurred in 214 of the 313 infants treated with the standard 3-dose course in our study). Because the degree of ductus constriction seems to determine the rate of anatomic remodeling and permanent closure, daily echocardiographic evaluations of ductal patency may be the best way to decide when indomethacin therapy is no longer needed. Our study suggests that infants who still have evidence of luminal patency, after a standard 3-dose course of indomethacin, may be likely to benefit from a longer course of indomethacin. Future randomized trials that examine the benefits of different lengths of indomethacin treatment may wish to take this into consideration.

Conclusions. Despite the increased effectiveness of a prolonged course of indomethacin, the rates of ductus reopening and surgical ligation were still very high in infants with a partially closed ductus. Other therapeutic approaches will need to be developed before permanent closure is likely to occur in this group of immature infants.

Key Words: premature infant • neonatology • indomethacin • patent ductus arteriosus

Abbreviations: Paw, mean airway pressure • FIO2, fraction of inspired oxygen • NEC, necrotizing enterocolitis


Received for publication Jan 8, 2002; Accepted Mar 29, 2002.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeoReviewsHome page
M. Narayanan-Sankar and R. I. Clyman
Pharmacology Review: Pharmacologic Closure of Patent Ductus Arteriosus in the Neonate
NeoReviews, August 1, 2003; 4(8): e215 - 221.
[Full Text] [PDF]