This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nadroo, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Holzman, I. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nadroo, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Holzman, I. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Premature & Newborn
PEDIATRICS Vol. 110 No. 1 July 2002, pp. 131-136

Changes in Upper Extremity Position Cause Migration of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Neonates

Ali M. Nadroo, MD*, Ronald B. Glass, MD{ddagger}, Jing Lin, MD*, Robert S. Green, MD* and Ian R. Holzman, MD*

* Department of Pediatrics, Division of Newborn Medicine, New York, New York
{ddagger} Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Objective. The migration of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) from the superior or inferior vena cava into the right atrium can pose a significant risk of lethal pericardial effusion and tamponade secondary to myocardial perforation. Arm movement has been reported to cause displacement of the catheter tip toward the heart and lead to ventricular tachycardia in adults. The objective of this study was to investigate whether adduction or abduction at the shoulder and flexion or extension at the elbow affect the position of PICCs placed via upper limb veins. We also hypothesized that arm movements can be used to reposition malpositioned catheters.

Methods. A total of 280 radiographs of 60 neonates with PICCs inserted via upper limb veins from July 2000 through June 2001 were reviewed. Differences in catheter tip position as a result of abduction versus adduction at the shoulder, flexion versus extension at the elbow, and combination changes in arm posture were determined by measurements in paired radiographs. Correction of malpositioned catheters was attempted in 10 patients by using arm movements without any alterations at the site of insertion.

Results. Arm movements were associated with significant displacement of catheters. Catheters that were placed via the basilic or axillary vein migrated toward the heart with adduction of the arm, whereas those that were placed via the cephalic vein moved away from the heart with adduction. Flexion of the elbow displaced catheters that were placed in the basilic or cephalic vein below the elbow toward the heart but did not have any effect on catheters that were placed via the axillary vein. For catheters that were placed in the basilic vein, simultaneous shoulder adduction and elbow flexion caused the greatest movement toward the heart (15.11 ± 1.22 mm). We were able to reposition correctly inappropriately placed catheters in 9 of 10 patients by using arm movements.

Conclusions. Arm movements significantly affect the position of the tip of the PICCs. Prevention of catheter migration into the right atrium requires radiographic determination of vein of insertion and monitoring of catheter tip position with upper extremity in position of maximum inward movement of catheter for that vein. Arm movements can be used to correct the malpositioned catheters.

Key Words: catheters • migration • arm movements

Abbreviations: PICC, peripherally inserted central catheter • SEM, standard error of the mean • ANOVA, analysis of variance


Received for publication Jul 10, 2001; Accepted Feb 8, 2002.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
S. Galloway and A. Bodenham
Long-term central venous access
Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2004; 92(5): 722 - 734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
K.-S. Chu, J.-H. Hsu, S.-S. Wang, C.-S. Tang, K.-I Cheng, C.-K. Wang, and J.-R. Wu
Accurate Central Venous Port-A Catheter Placement: Intravenous Electrocardiography and Surface Landmark Techniques Compared by Using Transesophageal Echocardiography
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2004; 98(4): 910 - 914.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeoReviewsHome page
V. Y. Chock
Therapeutic Techniques: Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Neonates
NeoReviews, February 1, 2004; 5(2): e60 - 62.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeoReviewsHome page
Index of Suspicion in the Nursery
NeoReviews, July 1, 2003; 4(7): e194 - 196.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
G Menon
Neonatal long lines
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., July 1, 2003; 88(4): F260 - F262.
[Full Text] [PDF]