This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nager, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, V. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nager, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, V. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Allergy & Dermatology

PEDIATRICS Vol. 109 No. 4 April 2002, pp. 566-572

Comparison of Nasogastric and Intravenous Methods of Rehydration in Pediatric Patients With Acute Dehydratio

Alan L. Nager, MD, FAAP and Vincent J. Wang, MD

From the Division of Emergency and Transport Medicine, Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, Department of Pediatrics and the Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California

--> Objective. To assess the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of rapid nasogastric hydration (RNG) and rapid intravenous hydration (RIV) administered in the emergency department (ED) to young children suffering with uncomplicated, acute moderate dehydration.

Methods. Ninety-six children aged 3 to 36 months, who presented with signs and symptoms of uncomplicated, acute moderate dehydration caused by vomiting and/or diarrhea, presumed to be caused by viral gastroenteritis, were randomly assigned to receive either RNG with a standard oral rehydration solution or RIV with normal saline. Each solution was administered at a rate of 50 mL/kg of body weight, delivered over a 3-hour period in our urban pediatric ED. All participants were weighed pretreatment and posttreatment and underwent initial and final measurements of their serum electrolytes, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and glucose levels, along with urine chemistry and urine specific gravity. Telephone follow-up by completion of a standardized questionnaire was obtained approximately 24 hours after discharge from the ED.

Results. Ninety-two of 96 enrolled patients completed the study. Three patients failed treatment (2 RIV and 1 RNG) and were excluded and hospitalized because of severe, intractable vomiting, and 1 patient was withdrawn secondary to an intussusception. Among 92 evaluable patients, 2 were found to be severely dehydrated (>10% change in body weight) and were excluded from analysis, leaving 90 patients (RNG: N = 46 and RIV: N = 44), who completed the study. Both RNG and RIV were found to be a safe and efficacious means of treating uncomplicated, acute moderate dehydration in the ED. Determinations of electrolytes, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, or glucose were not found to be of value on an intent-to-treat basis in the care of these patients. The urine specific gravity and incidence of ketonuria declined from levels commensurate with moderate dehydration in the RNG group, but not as consistently so in the RIV group. Both RNG and RIV were substantially less expensive to administer than standard care with intravenous fluid deficit therapy in-hospital, and RNG was more cost-effective to administer over RIV in the outpatient setting.

Conclusion. RNG and RIV administered in the ED are safe, efficacious, and cost-effective alternatives to the standard treatment for uncomplicated, acute moderate dehydration in young children. RNG is as efficacious as RIV, is no more labor intensive than RIV, and is associated with fewer complications. In addition, we found that most routine laboratory testing is of little value in these patients and should be avoided, except when clearly clinically indicated.

Key Words: pediatric • dehydration • oral rehydration therapy • nasogastric hydration • gastroenteritis

Abbreviations: IV, intravenous • ORT, oral replacement therapy • ED, emergency department • RNG, rapid nasogastric hydration • RIV, rapid intravenous hydration • CHLA, Childrens Hospital Los Angeles • NG, nasogastric • UTI, urinary tract infection • OFC, oral fluid challenge • BUN, blood urea nitrogen • SG, specific gravity

Received for publication May 15, 2001; Accepted Oct 4, 2001.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
K Neville, C Verge, A Rosenberg, M O'Meara, and J Walker
Is hyperchloraemic acidosis a problem in children with gastroenteritis rehydrated with normal saline? Authors' reply
Arch. Dis. Child., May 1, 2007; 92(5): 466 - 466.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Emerg. Med. J.Home page
A S Girisgin, F Acar, B Cander, M Gul, S Kocak, and S Bodur
Fluid replacement via the rectum for treatment of hypovolaemic shock in an animal model.
Emerg. Med. J., November 1, 2006; 23(11): 862 - 864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
K. A. Neville, C. F. Verge, M. W. O'Meara, and J. L. Walker
High Antidiuretic Hormone Levels and Hyponatremia in Children With Gastroenteritis
Pediatrics, December 1, 2005; 116(6): 1401 - 1407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
J. E. Wathen, T. MacKenzie, and J. P. Bothner
Usefulness of the Serum Electrolyte Panel in the Management of Pediatric Dehydration Treated With Intravenously Administered Fluids
Pediatrics, November 1, 2004; 114(5): 1227 - 1234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
B. K. Fonseca, A. Holdgate, and J. C. Craig
Enteral vs Intravenous Rehydration Therapy for Children With Gastroenteritis: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, May 1, 2004; 158(5): 483 - 490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
C Waitt, P Waitt, and M Pirmohamed
Intravenous therapy
Postgrad. Med. J., January 1, 2004; 80(939): 1 - 6.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Evid. Based Nurs.Home page
OTHER ARTICLES NOTED (Nov 01 to 18 Oct 02)
Evid. Based Nurs., January 1, 2003; 6(1): e1 - 1.
[Full Text] [PDF]