This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anhøj, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bisgaard, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anhøj, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bisgaard, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Allergy & Dermatology
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

PEDIATRICS Vol. 109 No. 3 March 2002, pp. e40


ELECTRONIC ARTICLE

Systemic Activity of Inhaled Steroids in 1- to 3-Year-Old Children With Asthma

Jacob Anhøj, MD, Anne Marie Bisgaard, MD and Hans Bisgaard, MD, DMSc

Pulmonary Service, Department of Paediatrics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

--> Objective. To study the systemic activity of inhaled steroids in young children.

Methods. Forty children with mild asthma aged 1 to 3 years were studied in a 3-way crossover, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Treatment with inhaled fluticasone propionate, 200 µg twice daily delivered via pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) and Babyhaler (FP400), was compared with budesonide, 200 µg twice daily delivered via pMDI and NebuChamber (BUD400), and to placebo. The Babyhaler was primed before use. Knemometry was used to detect systemic steroid activity. It was performed with a hand-held knemometer after 1 and 4 weeks of treatment. The increase in lower-leg length within this 3-week period was used as the outcome measure. The intention-to-treat population was analyzed by analysis of variance.

Results. The increases in the lower-leg length during placebo, BUD400, and FP400 treatments were 85, 45, and 34 µm/d, respectively (adjusted mean). The growth in lower-leg length was significantly reduced from both steroid treatments. The difference between BUD400 and placebo was -40 µm/d (n = 25; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -8 to -72). The difference between FP400 and placebo was -51 µm/d (n = 26; 95% CI: -19 to -83). The difference between FP and BUD was -11 µm/d and was not statistically significant (n = 28; 95% CI: 20 to -42).

Conclusion. FP and BUD are both systemically active in children 1 to 3 years old when administered for 4 weeks from their dedicated spacer devices in daily doses of 400 µg with no difference between the 2 steroid regimens. These findings call for studies of clinical side effects from these treatments of preschool children.

Key Words: inhaled corticosteroid • young child • knemometry • side effects • systemic effects

Abbreviations: ICS, inhaled corticosteroids • BUD, budesonide • FP, fluticasone propionate • pMDI, pressurized metered-dose inhaler • RCT, randomized, controlled trial • Plac, placebo


Received for publication Feb 21, 2001; Accepted Oct 1, 2001.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
Systemic Effects of Inhaled Corticosteroids in Children
Journal Watch (General), March 12, 2002; 2002(312): 5 - 5.
[Full Text]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Vs systemic corticosteroids
Roberto C. Garay, et al.
Pediatrics Online, 9 Mar 2002 [Full text]
Fluticasone vs. budesonide
Renato Cutrera
Pediatrics Online, 19 May 2002 [Full text]
Response to questions
Hans Bisgaard
Pediatrics Online, 25 Jul 2002 [Full text]