This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weichbold, V.
Right arrow Articles by Welzl-Mueller, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weichbold, V.
Right arrow Articles by Welzl-Mueller, K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Dentistry & Otolaryngology
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

PEDIATRICS Vol. 108 No. 5 November 2001, pp. 1111-1116

Maternal Concern About Positive Test Results in Universal Newborn Hearing Screening

Received Jan 16, 2001; accepted Apr 24, 2001.

Viktor Weichbold and Kunigunde Welzl-Mueller

From the Department of Hearing Voice and Speech Disorders, University Hospital, Innsbruck, Austria.

Objective.  A positive test result from universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) has been suspected to cause maternal concern. However, findings so far are inconclusive. Against the background of a 2-stage UNHS protocol, we investigated the extent of maternal concern in 2 different situations: 1) mothers' immediate reactions after a positive result at the first-stage test and 2) maternal concern during a 1-month period while waiting for the infant's hearing assessment after the infant also failed the retest (ie, the screening). In addition, we checked whether mothers who are informed by an audiologist about the low predictive validity of positive test results in hearing screening are less concerned about a positive result than mothers who are not informed.

Methods.  A prospective study was conducted over a 1-year period, in which all mothers whose infants tested positive in the first stage or failed the screening were questioned about their level of concern attributable to the positive test result.

Results.  Of 85 mothers whose infants tested positive in the first-stage test (situation 1), 34 (40%) did not know the result. Of the remaining 51 mothers, 59% were not at all concerned and 27% were only slightly concerned about the result, whereas 14% stated that they were highly concerned. In an additional sample of 43 mothers whose infants failed the screening (situation 2), 42% reported not being worried and 37% only slightly worried, whereas 21% were highly concerned about the positive screening result. No effect of information about the low predictive validity of positive test results on the extent of maternal concern could be ascertained.

Conclusions.  The results of this study contradict the findings of some previous surveys that reported considerably higher levels of maternal concern after a positive test in UNHS. The failure to demonstrate the impact of information on maternal concern might be attributable to the fact that the number of uninformed mothers was too small to affect our results perceptibly.  Key words:  universal newborn hearing screening, positive test result, maternal concern, information.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
H. D. Nelson, C. Bougatsos, and P. Nygren
Universal Newborn Hearing Screening: Systematic Review to Update the 2001 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation
Pediatrics, July 1, 2008; 122(1): e266 - e276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
C P B van der Ploeg, C I Lanting, M A Kauffman-de Boer, N N Uilenburg, J G de Ridder-Sluiter, and P H Verkerk
Examination of long-lasting parental concern after false-positive results of neonatal hearing screening
Arch. Dis. Child., June 1, 2008; 93(6): 508 - 511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
B. R. Vohr, J. Jodoin-Krauzyk, R. Tucker, M. J. Johnson, D. Topol, and M. Ahlgren
Results of Newborn Screening for Hearing Loss: Effects on the Family in the First 2 Years of Life
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, March 1, 2008; 162(3): 205 - 211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
C. L. Arnold, T. C. Davis, S. G. Humiston, J. A. Bocchini Jr, P. F. Bass III, A. Bocchini, E. M. Kennen, K. White, and I. Forsman
Infant Hearing Screening: Stakeholder Recommendations for Parent-Centered Communication
Pediatrics, May 1, 2006; 117(5/S1): S341 - S354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
B O Olusanya, L M Luxon, and S L Wirz
Infant hearing screening: route to informed choice
Arch. Dis. Child., November 1, 2004; 89(11): 1039 - 1040.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
Z Poulakis, M Barker, and M Wake
Six month impact of false positives in an Australian infant hearing screening programme
Arch. Dis. Child., January 1, 2003; 88(1): 20 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
R. Keren, M. Helfand, C. Homer, H. McPhillips, and T. A. Lieu
Projected Cost-Effectiveness of Statewide Universal Newborn Hearing Screening
Pediatrics, November 1, 2002; 110(5): 855 - 864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Univeral newborn hearing screen: is lack of maternal concern a cause for concern?
Anton Miller
Pediatrics Online, 7 Nov 2001 [Full text]
Univeral newborn hearing screen: is lack of maternal concern a cause for concern?
Vitkor Weichbold
Pediatrics Online, 9 Nov 2001 [Full text]