This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paysse, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paysse, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, E. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ophthalmology

PEDIATRICS Vol. 108 No. 4 October 2001, p. e74

ELECTRONIC ARTICLE:
Detection of Red Reflex Asymmetry by Pediatric Residents Using the Brückner Reflex Versus the MTI Photoscreener

Received Jan 29, 2001; accepted Jun 11, 2001.

Evelyn A. Paysse*, Dagger , Gayle C. Williams*, David K. Coats*, Dagger , and Eric A. WilliamsDagger

From the * Cullen Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, and Dagger  Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas.

Objective.  To compare the ability of pediatric residents to differentiate an asymmetric from a symmetric red reflex in patients with anisometropia and microstrabismus using the Brückner reflex and the Medical Technology Innovations (MTI) photoscreener.

Methods.  A prospective, masked, case-control study was performed. Twelve pediatric residents evaluated 10 study patients and 6 control subjects in a masked manner in 2 separate sessions, using the Brückner reflex or the MTI photoscreener, evaluating for asymmetric (abnormal) or symmetric (normal) red reflexes between the 2 eyes. Each study patient had asymmetric red reflexes and the amblyogenic risk factor of anisometropia or microstrabismus. Each control subject had symmetric red reflexes.

Results.  The pediatric residents had a mean correct score of 82% (69%-100%) using the MTI photoscreener versus a mean correct score of 65% (44%-81%) using the Brückner reflex (McNemar test: alpha  < 0.01). The sensitivity of the MTI photoscreener evaluation was 89% in comparison to 61% for the Brückner reflex. The specificities for the MTI photoscreener versus the Brückner reflex were similar at 69% and 71%, respectively.

Conclusions.  Pediatric residents were better at detecting asymmetric red reflexes in patients with anisometropia and microstrabismus when evaluating MTI photoscreener photographs than when evaluating the red reflexes by the Brückner reflex. The MTI photoscreener may be a more sensitive method than the Brückner reflex to screen for the common amblyogenic risk factors of anisometropia and microstrabismus by easier detection of red reflex asymmetry.  Key words:  amblyopia, red reflex, photoscreener, Brückner, anisometropia, microstrabismus.