PEDIATRICS Vol. 108 No. 4 October 2001, pp. 827-834
What If Pediatric Residents Could Bill for Their Outpatient Services?
Received Oct 18, 2000; accepted Feb 12, 2001.
, §
From the Departments of * Pediatrics and Objective. We prospectively studied
the potential of billing and coding practices of pediatric residents in
outpatient clinics and extrapolated our results to assess the financial
implications of billing inaccuracies. Using Medicare as a common
measure of "currency," we also used the relative value unit (RVU)
and ambulatory payment class methodologies as means of assessing the
productivity and financial value of resident-staffed pediatric clinics.
Methods. Residents were asked to submit voluntarily shadow
billing forms and documentation of outpatient clinic visits.
Documentation of work was assessed by a blinded reviewer, and current
procedure terminology evaluation and management codes were assigned.
Comparisons between resident codes and calculated codes were made.
Financial implications of physician productivity were calculated in
terms of dollar amounts and RVUs. Resource intensity was measured using the ambulatory payment class methodology.
Results. A total of 344 charts were reviewed. Coding
agreement for health maintenance visits was 86%, whereas agreement for
acute care visits was 38%. Eighty-three percent of coding disagreement
in the latter group was resulting from undercoding by residents. Errors
accounted for a 4.79% difference in potential reimbursement for all
visit types and a 19.10% difference for acute care visits. No
significant differences in shadow billing discrepancies were found
between different levels of training. Residents were predicted to
generate $67 230, $87 593, and $96 072 in Medicare revenue in the
outpatient clinic setting during each successive year of training. On
average, residents generated 1.17 ± 0.01 and 0.81 ± 0.02 work RVUs for each health maintenance visit and office visit,
respectively. Annual productivity from outpatient clinic settings was
estimated at 548, 735, and 893 work RVUs in the postgraduate levels 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
Conclusion. When pediatric residents are not trained
adequately in proper coding practices, the potential for billing
discrepancies is high and potential reimbursement differences may be
substantial. Discussion of financial issues should be considered in
curriculum development.
Anesthesia/Critical
Care, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
§ Nemours Office of Operational Assessment, Nemours Foundation, and the
Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, Delaware.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. B. Gill and R. C. Schutt Jr. Practice Management Education in Orthopaedic Surgical Residencies J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2007; 89(1): 216 - 219. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Cabana, D. Bruckman, K. Meister, J. F. Bradley, and N. Clark Documentation of Asthma Severity in Pediatric Outpatient Clinics Clinical Pediatrics, March 1, 2003; 42(2): 121 - 125. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Koempel and P. C. Young Residency Education, Billing Practices, and Compliance Issues Pediatrics, November 1, 2002; 110(5): 1031 - 1031. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. C. Young Should We Be Teaching Residents How to Bill for Their Outpatient Services? Pediatrics, October 1, 2001; 108(4): 999 - 999. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||







