PEDIATRICS Vol. 108 No. 3 September 2001, p. e40
Received Feb 22, 2001; accepted May 7, 2001.
,
,
From the * Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington,
Seattle, Washington; Departments of Objectives. To evaluate the work life
and job satisfaction of pediatric generalists and subspecialists in
comparison to each other and to a group of general internists and
internal medicine subspecialists.
Methods. Data were collected by survey of a national
sample of 5704 general pediatricians, subspecialty pediatricians,
general internists, internal medicine subspecialists, and family
physicians who were selected randomly from the American
Medical Association Masterfile using stratified sampling with
disproportionate weighting to ensure ethnic diversity and
representation of high managed care areas. Surveys were mailed up to 4 times and contained 150 items that reflected 10 facets of physician job
satisfaction as well as an assessment of individual and practice
demographic information. This study reports data from all groups except
for family medicine.
Results. The adjusted response rate was 58% for general
pediatricians (n = 590), 67% for specialty
pediatricians (n = 345), and 52% (n = 1823) for the entire pool. In comparison with
general internists, general pediatricians were more likely to be female
(44% vs 24%); to work part time (20% vs 12%); to have lower annual
income ($125 679 vs $143 875); and to report significantly higher
levels of job, career, and specialty satisfaction on a 5-point scale
(3.81 vs 3.52, 3.80 vs 3.55, and 3.76 vs 3.17 respectively). In
comparison with internal medicine subspecialists, pediatric
subspecialists were more likely to be female (42% vs 22%); to work in
academically affiliated settings (35% vs 17%); to have lower incomes
($156 284 vs $192 006); to receive significantly less time for a
complete history and physical examination (39 minutes vs 51 minutes);
and to report similar levels of job, career, and specialty satisfaction (3.69 vs 3.71, 3.74 vs 3.78, and 3.60 vs 3.47 respectively). Of all 4 physician groups, general pediatricians worked the fewest hours
(50/week), spent the greatest percentage of time in the office and the
lowest percentage in the hospital (58% and 16%, respectively), saw
the lowest percentage of patients with complex medical and complex
psychosocial problems (15% and 17%, respectively), and were the least
likely to endorse symptoms of burnout or job stress (13% and 18%,
respectively). In comparison, pediatric subspecialists worked longer
hours (59/week), spent the lowest percentage of time in the office and
the greatest percentage of time in the hospital (22% and 44%,
respectively), saw a much higher percentage of patients with complex
medical and complex psychosocial problems (46% and 25%,
respectively), and reported significantly higher levels of burnout and
job stress (23% and 26%, respectively).
Conclusions. Despite lower incomes, general pediatricians
reported the highest levels of satisfaction and the least job stress of
all 4 physician groups, whereas pediatric subspecialists reported
levels of stress and burnout that raise significant concerns for the workforce of pediatric subspecialists of the future. Initiatives that
improve clinical workload, balance inpatient and outpatient hours, and
increase personal time of pediatric subspecialists should be
considered.
Medicine and § Biostatistics,
University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin;
Department of
Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama;
and ¶ Department of Pediatrics and the Program on Primary Care and
Health Professionals, # Cecil Sheps Center for Health Services Research,
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North
Carolina.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. D. Misra-Hebert, R. Kay, and J. K. Stoller A Review of Physician Turnover: Rates, Causes, and Consequences American Journal of Medical Quality, March 1, 2004; 19(2): 56 - 66. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Polsky and R. M. Werner The Future of Child Neurology: A Profile of Child Neurology Residents J Child Neurol, January 1, 2004; 19(1): 6 - 13. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||