This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pandit, P. B.
Right arrow Articles by Habib, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pandit, P. B.
Right arrow Articles by Habib, R. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Premature & Newborn
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

PEDIATRICS Vol. 108 No. 3 September 2001, pp. 682-685

Work of Breathing During Constant- and Variable-Flow Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Neonates

Received Dec 7, 2000; accepted Feb 8, 2001.

Paresh B. Pandit*, Dagger , Sherry E. CourtneyDagger , §, Kee H. PyonDagger , §, Judy G. SaslowDagger , §, and Robert H. Habibparallel

From the * University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey/Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Camden, New Jersey; Dagger  Virtua-West Jersey Hospital, Voorhees, New Jersey; § Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, The Children's Regional Hospital at Cooper Hospital/UMC, Camden, New Jersey; and parallel  Mercy Children's Hospital at St. Vincent Mercy Medical Center and Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Ohio, Toledo, Ohio.

Background.  Constant-flow nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) often is used in preterm neonates to recruit and maintain lung volume. Physical model studies indicate that a variable-flow NCPAP device provides more stable volume recruitment with less imposed work of breathing (WOB). Although superior lung recruitment with variable-flow NCPAP has been demonstrated in preterm neonates, corroborating WOB data are lacking.

Objective.  To measure and compare WOB associated with the use of variable-flow versus constant-flow NCPAP in preterm neonates.

Methods.  Twenty-four preterm infants who were receiving constant-flow NCPAP (means, SD) and had birth weight of 1024 ± 253 g, gestational age of 28 ± 1.7 weeks, age of 14 ± 13 days, and FIO2 of 0.3 ± 0.1 were studied. Variable-flow and constant-flow NCPAP were applied in random order. We measured changes in lung volume and tidal ventilation (VT) by DC-coupled/calibrated respiratory inductance plethysmography as well as esophageal pressures at NCPAP of 8, 6, 4, and 0 cm H2O. Inspiratory WOB (WOBI) and lung compliance were calculated from the esophageal pressure and VT data using standard methods. WOB was divided by VT to standardize the results.

Results.  WOBI decreased at all CPAP levels with variable-flow NCPAP, with a maximal decrease at 4 cm H2O. WOBI increased at all CPAP levels with constant-flow CPAP. Lung compliance increased at all NCPAP levels with variable-flow, with a relative decrease at 8 cm H2O, whereas it increased only at 8 cm H2O with constant-flow NCPAP. Compared with constant-flow NCPAP, WOBI was 13% to 29% lower with variable-flow NCPAP.

Conclusion.  WOBI is decreased with variable-flow NCPAP compared with constant-flow NCPAP. The increase in WOBI with constant-flow NCPAP indicates the presence of appreciable imposed WOB with this device. Our study, performed in neonates with little lung disease, indicates the possibility of lung overdistention at CPAP of 6 to 8 cm H2O with the variable-flow device. Further study is necessary to determine the efficacy of variable-flow NCPAP in neonates with significant lung disease and its use over extended periods of time.continuous-flow and variable-flow NCPAP, work of breathing, premature neonates, lung compliance.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
T Pantalitschka, J Sievers, M S Urschitz, T Herberts, C Reher, and C F Poets
Randomised crossover trial of four nasal respiratory support systems for apnoea of prematurity in very low birthweight infants
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., July 1, 2009; 94(4): F245 - F248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
O Karam, C Donatiello, E Van Lancker, V Chritin, R E Pfister, and P C Rimensberger
Noise levels during nCPAP are flow-dependent but not device-dependent
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., March 1, 2008; 93(2): F132 - F134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
A A Hutchison and S Bignall
Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in the preterm neonate: reducing endotrauma and the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., January 1, 2008; 93(1): F64 - F68.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
H. Boumecid, T. Rakza, A. Abazine, S. Klosowski, R. Matran, and L. Storme
Influence of three nasal continuous positive airway pressure devices on breathing pattern in preterm infants
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., July 1, 2007; 92(4): F298 - F300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
S. Tsuchida, D. Engelberts, M. Roth, C. McKerlie, M. Post, and B. P. Kavanagh
Continuous positive airway pressure causes lung injury in a model of sepsis
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, October 1, 2005; 289(4): L554 - L564.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
A G De Paoli, R Lau, P G Davis, and C J Morley
Pharyngeal pressure in preterm infants receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., January 1, 2005; 90(1): F79 - F81.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
F Sandri, G Ancora, A Lanzoni, P Tagliabue, M Colnaghi, M L Ventura, M Rinaldi, I Mondello, P Gancia, G P Salvioli, et al.
Prophylactic nasal continuous positive airways pressure in newborns of 28-31 weeks gestation: multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., September 1, 2004; 89(5): F394 - F398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
B. M. Stefanescu, W. P. Murphy, B. J. Hansell, M. Fuloria, T. M. Morgan, and J. L. Aschner
A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Two Different Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Systems for the Successful Extubation of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants
Pediatrics, November 1, 2003; 112(5): 1031 - 1038.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. H. Habib, K. H. Pyon, S. E. Courtney, and Z. H. Aghai
Spectral characteristics of airway opening and chest wall tidal flows in spontaneously breathing preterm infants
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2003; 94(5): 1933 - 1940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
A G De Paoli, C Morley, and P G Davis
Nasal CPAP for neonates: what do we know in 2003?
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2003; 88(3): F168 - F172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

CPAP and work of breathing
Kenneth Harkavy
Pediatrics Online, 18 Oct 2001 [Full text]