This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, M. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Premature & Newborn
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

PEDIATRICS Vol. 108 No. 2 August 2001, p. e35

ELECTRONIC ARTICLE:
A New and Improved Population-Based Canadian Reference for Birth Weight for Gestational Age

Received Aug 21, 2000; accepted Apr 9, 2001.

Michael S. Kramer*, Dagger , Robert W. Platt*, Dagger , Shi Wu Wen§, K.S. Josephparallel , Alexander Allenparallel , Michal AbrahamowiczDagger , Béatrice Blondel, Gérard Bréart, and for the Fetal/Infant Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System

From the Departments of * Pediatrics and of Dagger  Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Canada; § Bureau of Reproductive and Child Health, Health Canada, Ottawa, Canada; parallel  Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University Faculty of Medicine, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada; and the  Epidemiological Research Unit on Perinatal and Women's Health (INSERM), Villejuif, France.

Background.  Existing fetal growth references all suffer from 1 or more major methodologic problems, including errors in reported gestational age, biologically implausible birth weight for gestational age, insufficient sample sizes at low gestational age, single-hospital or other non-population-based samples, and inadequate statistical modeling techniques.

Methods.  We used the newly developed Canadian national linked file of singleton births and infant deaths for births between 1994 and 1996, for which gestational age is largely based on early ultrasound estimates. Assuming a normal distribution for birth weight at each gestational age, we used the expectation-maximization algorithm to exclude infants with gestational ages that were more consistent with 40-week births than with the observed gestational age. Distributions of birth weight at the corrected gestational ages were then statistically smoothed.

Results.  The resulting male and female curves provide smooth and biologically plausible means, standard deviations, and percentile cutoffs for defining small- and large-for-gestational-age births. Large-for-gestational age cutoffs (90th percentile) at low gestational ages are considerably lower than those of existing references, whereas small-for-gestational-age cutoffs (10th percentile) postterm are higher. For example, compared with the current World Health Organization reference from California (Williams et al, 1982) and a recently proposed US national reference (Alexander et al, 1996), the 90th percentiles for singleton males at 30 weeks are 1837 versus 2159 and 2710 g. The corresponding 10th percentiles at 42 weeks are 3233 versus 3086 and 2998 g.

Conclusions.  This new sex-specific, population-based reference should improve clinical assessment of growth in individual newborns, population-based surveillance of geographic and temporal trends in birth weight for gestational age, and evaluation of clinical or public health interventions to enhance fetal growth. fetal growth, birth weight, gestational age, preterm birth, postterm birth. .


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
M. S Kramer, C. V Ananth, R. W Platt, and K. Joseph
US Black vs White disparities in foetal growth: physiological or pathological?
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2006; 35(5): 1187 - 1195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
O. Basso, A. J. Wilcox, and C. R. Weinberg
Birth Weight and Mortality: Causality or Confounding?
Am. J. Epidemiol., August 15, 2006; 164(4): 303 - 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
B. Schmidt, R. S. Roberts, P. Davis, L. W. Doyle, K. J. Barrington, A. Ohlsson, A. Solimano, W. Tin, and the Caffeine for Apnea of Prematurity Trial Group
Caffeine Therapy for Apnea of Prematurity
N. Engl. J. Med., May 18, 2006; 354(20): 2112 - 2121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
Z.-C. Luo, W. J Kierans, R. Wilkins, R. M Liston, S.-H. Uh, M. S Kramer, and for the British Columbia Vital Statistics Agency
Infant mortality among First Nations versus non-First Nations in British Columbia: temporal trends in rural versus urban areas, 1981-2000
Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2004; 33(6): 1252 - 1259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
D. K. Tisi, J. J. Emard, and K. G. Koski
Total Protein Concentration in Human Amniotic Fluid Is Negatively Associated with Infant Birth Weight
J. Nutr., July 1, 2004; 134(7): 1754 - 1758.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CMAJHome page
C. Ouzilleau, M.-A. Roy, L. Leblanc, A. Carpentier, and P. Maheux
An observational study comparing 2-hour 75-g oral glucose tolerance with fasting plasma glucose in pregnant women: both poorly predictive of birth weight
Can. Med. Assoc. J., February 18, 2003; 168(4): 403 - 409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Missing reference
Philip J Beeby
Pediatrics Online, 15 Oct 2001 [Full text]