This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by de Klerk, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by de Klerk, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Premature & Newborn
Right arrowRelated AAP Red Book topics:
Yersinia enterocolitica and...

PEDIATRICS Vol. 108 No. 2 August 2001, pp. 395-401

A Clinical Comparison of Radiant Warmer and Incubator Care for Preterm Infants From Birth to 1800 Grams

Received Aug 30, 2000; accepted Feb 5, 2001.

Michael P. Meyer*, Matthew J. PaytonDagger , Andrew SalmonDagger , Chris HutchinsonDagger , and Alan de Klerk*

From the * Neonatal Unit, Paediatrics and Child Health, Middlemore Hospital and the University of Auckland; and Dagger  Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand.

Objective.  The objective of this study was to compare radiant warmer and incubator care for preterm infants from birth with respect to temperature control and weight gain.

Methods.  Sixty preterm infants <33 weeks' gestation were randomized at birth to radiant warmer or incubator care. The initial goal was to maintain abdominal temperature at 36.8°C in both groups and axillary temperature at 36.8 to 37.3°C; air servocontrol was used for incubator infants. Infants in both groups received added humidity for 5 days if their weight was <1000 g and for 3 days if they weighed between 1000 and 1249 g. During a 3-hour period on days 1 to 7, recordings of abdominal, forehead, and foot temperatures were obtained. The percentage of the recording time during which the abdominal temperature was in the target range of between 36°C and 37.5°C was determined as an indicator of temperature control. Weight gain from birth to 1800 g was compared. Secondary outcomes included fluid balance and clinical events.

Results.  There were 30 infants in each group; 48 were <1500 g (of whom 17 were <1000 g). There were no significant differences in birth weight, gestation, gender, or illness severity scores in the 2 groups. Significant differences in temperature control were noted on day 1. Although admission temperatures were similar, lower abdominal temperatures were noted in the first 2 hours of life in the incubator group (medians were 36.6°C and 35.9°C in the radiant warmer and incubator groups, respectively). Similarly, mean abdominal temperatures during the 3-hour recording on day 1 were lower in the incubator group, and infants in this group spent a significantly greater percentage of the recording time with temperatures outside the target range (17.3% compared with 0.88%). Other temperature recordings from the forehead and foot were not significantly different in the groups. Fluid intakes were higher for infants under radiant warmer on days 2, 3, and 4, and the difference amounted to a mean of 12.8 mL/kg/d. Maximum sodium levels in the first week were similar in the 2 groups. Mean weight gain was 17.4 g/kg/d for the radiant warmer group and 17.1 g/kg/d for the incubator group; days to regain birth weight and length of hospital stay were not significantly different. Greater numbers of infants in the radiant warmer group required phototherapy, and adverse events (which included death, necrotizing enterocolitis, chronic lung disease, grade 3 or 4 intraventricular hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, or retinopathy requiring laser treatment) were less frequent in the radiant warmer group (1 infant compared with 8 in the incubator group; relative risk 0.1; 95% confidence intervals: 0.01-0.82).

Conclusions.  This study has shown differences in abdominal temperatures on day 1 and outcome, although the latter finding should be viewed with caution because of the sample size. The results indicate benefits for the initial use of the radiant warmer after birth. Although fluid requirements were higher in the radiant warmer group for days 2 through 4, the increased fluid volumes were given without apparent adverse effect.  Key words:  radiant warmer, incubator, preterm infant, temperature.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
N Modi
Management of fluid balance in the very immature neonate
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., March 1, 2004; 89(2): F108 - F111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
N. McIntosh, A. J. Lyon, M. Meyer, and M. Payton
Keeping Infants Warm
Pediatrics, August 1, 2002; 110(2): 424 - 425.
[Full Text] [PDF]