This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Amirav, I.
Right arrow Articles by Newhouse, M. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Amirav, I.
Right arrow Articles by Newhouse, M. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Allergy & Dermatology

PEDIATRICS Vol. 108 No. 2 August 2001, pp. 389-394

Aerosol Therapy With Valved Holding Chambers in Young Children: Importance of the Facemask Seal

Received Aug 25, 2000; accepted Feb 8, 2001.

Israel Amirav* and Michael T. Newhouse*, Dagger

From the * Pediatric Department, R. Sieff Hospital, Safed, Israel; and Dagger  Department of Medicine, McMaster University Barnett Medical Aerosol Research Laboratory, St Joseph Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Objective.  Masks are an essential interface between valved holding chambers (VHCs), or spacers, and a small child's face for providing aerosol therapy. Clinical experience suggests that many young children do not cooperate with the VHC treatment or tolerate a mask of any kind. This might impair the mask-face seal and reduce the dose delivered to the child. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of parents to provide a good mask-face seal in infants and toddlers using 3 masks provided with commonly used pediatric VHCs and compare this with the seal obtained with the Hans Rudolph pediatric anesthesia mask.

Methods.  A preliminary in vitro filter study was conducted to validate the assumption that reduced ventilation as a result of increased facemask leak reduces the drug aerosol dose delivered to the mouth. Facemask leak then was studied in vivo for NebuChamber, AeroChamber, BabyHaler, and Hans Rudolph masks by measuring ventilation with an in-line pneumotachograph while the facemask was held in place by experienced parents who were asked to demonstrate how they deliver medication to their children without any additional instruction. Thirty children (mean age: 3.2 ± 1.4 years) performed 4 repeat studies with each mask. The first 10 patients performed the tests once again within 1 month. On the second occasion, the parents were coached continuously and encouraged to hold the mask tightly against the child's face.

Results.  The AeroChamber and Hans Rudolph masks provided the best seal as reflected in the magnitude of the ventilation measured through them. The NebuChamber provided the poorest seal, with 45% less ventilation than the AeroChamber and Hans Rudolph masks. There was considerable intraindividual variability for all masks (24% to 48%); however, the variability with the NebuChamber mask was 2-fold greater than the other masks. All ventilatory volumes during the coached session were significantly greater than during the uncoached session. Variability during the coached session was significantly less (except for the BabyHaler, which remained unchanged).

Conclusions.  VHCs with masks designed for use with small children may provide a poor seal with the face, leading to reduced or more variable dose delivery. The facemask seal is critical for efficient aerosol delivery to infants and young children, and this should be stressed to parents.  Key words:  aerosol therapy, metered dose inhalers, holding chambers, masks, children, ventilation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Pediatr PsycholHome page
T. Lindholm, R. L. Sjoberg, C. Pedroletti, A. Boman, G. L. Olsson, A. Sund, and F. Lindblad
Infants' and Toddlers' Remembering and Forgetting of a Stressful Medical Procedure
J. Pediatr. Psychol., June 23, 2008; (2008) jsn066v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ChestHome page
K. W. Harris and G. C. Smaldone
Facial and Ocular Deposition of Nebulized Budesonide: Effects of Face Mask Design
Chest, February 1, 2008; 133(2): 482 - 488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 AAP Grand RoundsHome page
M. Dubik
Metered Dose Inhalers: What a Difference a Mask Makes
AAP Grand Rounds, June 1, 2006; 15(6): 70 - 70.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ChestHome page
B. K. Rubin
What Does It Mean When a Patient Says, "My Asthma Medication Is Not Working?"
Chest, September 1, 2004; 126(3): 972 - 981.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
I Amirav, I Balanov, M Gorenberg, D Groshar, and A S Luder
Nebuliser hood compared to mask in wheezy infants: aerosol therapy without tears!
Arch. Dis. Child., August 1, 2003; 88(8): 719 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
I Amirav, Y Mansour, T Tiosano, S Chamny, S Chirurg, S Oren, Z Grossman, L Kahana, E Kahan, and M T Newhouse
Safety of inhaled corticosteroids delivered by plastic and metal spacers
Arch. Dis. Child., June 1, 2003; 88(6): 527 - 528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
C. C. Randolph
Aerosol Therapy with Valved Holding Chambers in Young Children, Importance of a Face Mask Seal
Pediatrics, August 1, 2002; 110(2): 456 - 456.
[Full Text] [PDF]