This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by King, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Pless, I. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by King, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Pless, I. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice

PEDIATRICS Vol. 108 No. 2 August 2001, pp. 382-388

The Effectiveness of a Home Visit to Prevent Childhood Injury

Received Jun 9, 2000; accepted Feb 20, 2001.

W. James King*, Terry P. KlassenDagger , John LeBlanc§, Anne-Claude Bernard-Bonninparallel , Yvonne Robitaille, Ba' Pham*, Douglas Coyle#, Milton Tenenbein**, and I. Barry PlessDagger Dagger

From the * Department of Pediatrics and Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Dagger  Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; § Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia; parallel  Department of Pediatrics, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada;  Direction de la sante publique de Montreal-Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; # Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; ** Department of Pediatrics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba; Dagger Dagger  Department of Pediatrics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Objective.  To examine the effectiveness of a home visit program to improve home safety and decrease the frequency of injury in children. We examined the effects of the program on 1) parental injury awareness and knowledge; 2) the extent that families used home safety measures; 3) the rate of injury; and 4) the cost effectiveness of the intervention.

Design.  A randomized, controlled trial.

Setting.  A multicenter trial conducted at 5 hospitals in 4 Canadian urban centers.

Participants.  Children <8 years old, initially enrolled in an injury case-control study, were eligible to participate.

Intervention.  Subsequent to a home inspection conducted to determine baseline hazard rates for both groups, participants in the intervention group received a single home visit that included the provision of an information package, discount coupons, and specific instruction regarding home safety measures.

Main Results.  The median age was 2 years, with males comprising ~60% of participants. The experimental groups were comparable at outset in terms of case-control status, age, gender, and socioeconomic status. Parental injury awareness and knowledge was high; 73% correctly identified injury as the leading cause of death in children, and an intervention effect was not demonstrated. The adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for the home inspection items indicated that significant safety modifications only occurred in the number of homes having hot water not exceeding 54°C (OR: 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14, 1.50) or the presence of a smoke detector (OR: 1.45, 95% CI: 0.94, 2.22). However, the intervention group reported home safety modifications of 62% at 4 months and significantly less injury visits to the doctor compared with the nonintervention group (rate ratio: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.58, 0.96). The total costs of care for injuries were significantly lower in the intervention group compared with the nonintervention group with a cost of $372 per injury prevented.

Conclusions.  An intervention using a single home visit to improve the extent to which families use safety measures was found to be insufficient to influence the long-term adoption of home safety measures, but was effective to decrease the overall occurrence of injuries. Future programs should target a few, well-focused, evidence-based areas including the evaluation of high-risk groups and the effect of repeated visits on outcome.  Key words:  injury, home visit, randomized controlled trial, safety, children, cost effectiveness.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
D Kendrick, S Smith, A Sutton, M Watson, C Coupland, C Mulvaney, and A Mason-Jones
Effect of education and safety equipment on poisoning-prevention practices and poisoning: systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression
Arch. Dis. Child., July 1, 2008; 93(7): 599 - 608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Inj. Prev.Home page
L Swart, A van Niekerk, M Seedat, and E Jordaan
Paraprofessional home visitation program to prevent childhood unintentional injuries in low-income communities: a cluster randomized controlled trial
Inj. Prev., June 1, 2008; 14(3): 164 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 TraumaHome page
J. Bayreuther and I. Maconochie
The evidenced-based care behind the early management of head injured children
Trauma, April 1, 2008; 10(2): 85 - 92.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Pediatr PsycholHome page
K. J. Brown, M. C. Roberts, S. Mayes, and R. E. Boles
Effects of Parental Viewing of Children's Risk Behavior on Home Safety Practices
J. Pediatr. Psychol., October 1, 2005; 30(7): 571 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Inj. Prev.Home page
S G Hendrickson
Reaching an underserved population with a randomly assigned home safety intervention
Inj. Prev., October 1, 2005; 11(5): 313 - 317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Inj. Prev.Home page
W J King, J C LeBlanc, N J Barrowman, T P Klassen, A-C Bernard-Bonnin, Y Robitaille, M Tenenbein, and I B Pless
Long term effects of a home visit to prevent childhood injury: three year follow up of a randomized trial
Inj. Prev., April 1, 2005; 11(2): 106 - 109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
M. Watson, D. Kendrick, C. Coupland, A. Woods, D. Futers, and J. Robinson
Providing child safety equipment to prevent injuries: randomised controlled trial
BMJ, January 22, 2005; 330(7484): 178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Inj. Prev.Home page
M Sznajder, S Leduc, M P Janvrin, M H Bonnin, P Aegerter, F Baudier, B Chevallier, and C Macarthur
Home delivery of an injury prevention kit for children in four French cities: a controlled randomized trial * Commentary
Inj. Prev., September 1, 2003; 9(3): 261 - 265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Evid. Based Nurs.Home page
OTHER ARTICLES NOTED (Nov 01 to 18 Oct 02)
Evid. Based Nurs., January 1, 2003; 6(1): e1 - 1.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
A. C. Gielen, E. M. McDonald, M. E. H. Wilson, W.-T. Hwang, J. R. Serwint, J. S. Andrews, and M.-C. Wang
Effects of Improved Access to Safety Counseling, Products, and Home Visits on Parents' Safety Practices: Results of a Randomized Trial
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, January 1, 2002; 156(1): 33 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]