This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Isaacman, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mason, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Isaacman, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mason, J. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

PEDIATRICS Vol. 108 No. 2 August 2001, pp. 354-358

Comparative Practice Patterns of Emergency Medicine Physicians and Pediatric Emergency Medicine Physicians Managing Fever in Young Children

Received Sep 18, 2000; accepted Dec 18, 2000.

Daniel J. Isaacman*, Kimberly KaminerDagger , Hari Veligeti*, Michael Jones*, Paris Davis*, and Jon D. MasonDagger

From the * Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Departments of Pediatrics and Dagger  Emergency Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia.

Background/Objective.  The management of fever in young children is a controversial topic. This study seeks to compare the management approaches between general emergency medicine physicians (GEMPs) and pediatric emergency medicine physicians (PEMPs) and correlate them to existing practice guidelines.

Design/Methods.  All charts of children age 3 to 36 months presenting with the complaint of fever at both a children's hospital emergency department (ED) and a general ED from June 1, 1998 to September 1, 1998; December 1, 1998 to April 1, 1999; and June 1, 1999 to September 1, 1999 were retrospectively reviewed. Fever was defined as >= 39°C. Patients with a history of immunodeficiency, chronic illness, ventriculoperitoneal shunt, antibiotic use in the past 48 hours, or focal infection noted on examination were excluded. Data collected included focal exam findings, laboratory tests, diagnosis, treatment, and disposition. Variances from the practice guidelines were tabulated and compared.

Results.  One thousand three hundred twenty-three eligible children met exclusion criteria and were seen by PEMPs; 755 were eliminated because of exclusion criteria (526 because of focal infection). Twenty-two (4%) of 568 remaining patients were admitted to the hospital. Two hundred twenty-eight eligible children were seen by GEMPs; 147 were excluded (109 because of focal infection). No patients were admitted to the hospital. PEMPs ordered more complete blood counts (324/568 vs 27/81), more blood cultures (321/568 vs 27/81), and more urine cultures (208/568 vs 20/81) than GEMPs. GEMPs ordered more chest radiographs and cerebrospinal fluid analyses than PEMPs; GEMPs ordered less complete blood counts, blood cultures, and urine cultures than PEMPs. GEMPs diagnosed more focal infections (109/228 vs 526/1323), and conflicted more often with the practice guidelines (66/79 vs 225/498) than PEMPs. Patients spent an average of 2.26 ± 0.16 hours in the pediatric ED versus 3.0 hours ± 0.18 hours in the general ED.

Conclusions.  Significant differences in the management of the young child with fever and no source exist between these two groups of physicians. These variations affect both cost and standard of care. Future studies assessing whether these strategies affect patient outcomes would further elucidate their clinical implication.  Key words:  laboratory utilization, practice patterns, child.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Emerg. Med. J.Home page
A Downing and G Rudge
A study of childhood attendance at emergency departments in the West Midlands region
Emerg. Med. J., May 1, 2006; 23(5): 391 - 393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
E. A. Jewett, M. R. Anderson, and G. S. Gilchrist
The Pediatric Subspecialty Workforce: Public Policy and Forces for Change
Pediatrics, November 1, 2005; 116(5): 1192 - 1202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
T. Maldonado and J. R. Avner
Triage of the Pediatric Patient in the Emergency Department: Are We All in Agreement?
Pediatrics, August 1, 2004; 114(2): 356 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
L. C. Hampers, S. G. Faries, and S. R. Poole
Regional After-Hours Urgent Care Provided by a Tertiary Children's Hospital
Pediatrics, December 1, 2002; 110(6): 1117 - 1124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
D. W. Johnson, C. Adair, R. Brant, J. Holmwood, and I. Mitchell
Differences in Admission Rates of Children With Bronchiolitis by Pediatric and General Emergency Departments
Pediatrics, October 1, 2002; 110(4): e49 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
N. Kuppermann
The Evaluation of Young Febrile Children for Occult Bacteremia: Time to Reevaluate Our Approach?
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, September 1, 2002; 156(9): 855 - 857.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
A. E. Carroll, S. Saluja, and P. Tarczy-Hornoch
Consumer Health Information on the Internet
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2002; 9(4): 402 - 403.
[Full Text] [PDF]