This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kahn, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Emans, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kahn, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Emans, S. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Adolescent Medicine

PEDIATRICS Vol. 108 No. 2 August 2001, pp. 333-341

Intention to Return for Papanicolaou Smears in Adolescent Girls and Young Women

Received Sep 27, 2000; accepted Dec 21, 2000.

Jessica A. Kahn*, Elizabeth Goodman*, Gail B. Slap*, Bin Huang*, and S. Jean EmansDagger

From the * Division of Adolescent Medicine, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; and Dagger  Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Objective.  Sexually active adolescent girls have high rates of abnormal cervical cytology. However, little is known about factors that influence intention to return for Papanicolaou screening or follow-up. The aim of this study was to determine whether a theory-based model that assessed knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors predicted intention to return.

Methods.  The study design consisted of a self-administered, cross-sectional survey that assessed knowledge, beliefs, perceived control over follow-up, perceived risk, cues for Papanicolaou smears, impulsivity, risk behaviors, and past compliance with Papanicolaou smear follow-up. Participants were recruited from a hospital-based adolescent clinic that provides primary and subspecialty care, and the study sample consisted of all sexually active girls and young women who were aged 12 to 24 years and had had previous Papanicolaou smears. The main outcome measure was intention to return for Papanicolaou smear screening or follow-up.

Results.  The enrollment rate was 92% (N = 490), mean age was 18.2 years, 50% were black, and 22% were Hispanic. Eighty-two percent of participants intended to return. Variables that were independently associated with intention to return included positive beliefs about follow-up (odds ratio [OR]: 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.11), perception that important others believe that the participant should obtain a Papanicolaou smear (OR: 1.93; 95% CI: 1.38-2.74), perceived control over returning (OR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.06-1.46), and having received cues to obtain a Papanicolaou smear (OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.08-1.60).

Conclusions.  Analysis of this novel theoretical framework demonstrated that knowledge and previous behaviors were not associated with intention to return for Papanicolaou smear screening and follow-up in this population of young women. However, modifiable attitudinal components, including personal beliefs, perception of others' beliefs, and cues to obtaining Papanicolaou smears, were associated with intention to return.  Key words:  Papanicolaou smears, adolescent, intention to return.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
K. A. Robb, A. Miles, and J. Wardle
Perceived Risk of Colorectal Cancer: Sources of Risk Judgments
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2007; 16(4): 694 - 702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Obstet GynecolHome page
J. D. Wright, J. S. Rader, R. Davila, M. A. Powell, D. G. Mutch, F. Gao, and R. K. Gibb
Human papillomavirus triage for young women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 2006; 107(4): 822 - 829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Obstet GynecolHome page
J. D. Wright, R. M. Davila, K. R. Pinto, D. F. Merritt, R. K. Gibb, J. S. Rader, D. G. Mutch, F. Gao, and M. A. Powell
Cervical Dysplasia in Adolescents
Obstet. Gynecol., July 1, 2005; 106(1): 115 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Pediatr PsycholHome page
K. P. Tercyak, M. Nicolas, T. Councill, S. Prahlad, K. L. Taylor, and A. T. Shad
Brief Report: Health Beliefs Among Survivors of Childhood Cancer
J. Pediatr. Psychol., July 1, 2004; 29(5): 397 - 402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Obstet GynecolHome page
J. A. Kahn, E. Goodman, B. Huang, G. B. Slap, and S. J. Emans
Predictors of Papanicolaou Smear Return in a Hospital-Based Adolescent and Young Adult Clinic
Obstet. Gynecol., March 1, 2003; 101(3): 490 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann OncolHome page
Research charities try pharma industry trick.
Ann. Onc., February 1, 2002; 13(2): 179 - 180.
[Full Text] [PDF]