This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Erickson, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Erickson, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, R. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice

PEDIATRICS Vol. 108 No. 1 July 2001, pp. 98-102

Barriers to Domestic Violence Screening in the Pediatric Setting

Received May 10, 2000; accepted Nov 9, 2000.

Mary J. Erickson*, Teresa D. HillDagger , and Robert M. Siegel§, parallel

From the * Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Dagger  Center for Outcomes Research and Clinical Effectiveness, Good Samaritan Hospital, Dayton, Ohio; § Cincinnati Pediatric Research Group Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; and parallel  Northern Kentucky Children's Advocacy Center, Bellevue, Kentucky.

Objective.  By surveying practitioners in our community, we hoped to determine what pediatricians and family physicians (FPs) perceive as barriers to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Recommendation on Domestic Violence Screening.

Background.  When screened in the pediatric setting, as many as 40% of mothers will disclose domestic violence (DV) by their partner. Recognizing the profound effects of DV on children, the AAP recently recommended that all practitioners incorporate DV screening as a part of routine anticipatory guidance. Yet, there is little information about whether pediatricians have the training, the time to screen, or understand the magnitude of this problem.

Design/Methods.  A 22-question survey about attitudes, training, and current DV screening practice was sent to all general pediatricians and FPs with admitting privileges to Children's Hospital Medical Center in Cincinnati, Ohio. A copy of the AAP recommendation on screening was included. The vast majority of practitioners with an appreciable pediatric practice in the surrounding tri-state area of 1.8 million people have privileges at the institution.

Results.  After 2 mailings, 310 (57%) of 547 of questionnaires were returned. The majority of practitioners (64%) were unaware of the AAP recommendation, but 51% of practitioners screened at least high-risk families for DV and 49% had identified a case of DV in their practice. Still, only 8.5% routinely screened for DV and 74% had received no specific DV training. Fifty-eight percent of practitioners estimated the incidence of DV to be <5% in their practice. The most commonly perceived barriers to screening were lack of education (61%), office protocol (60%), time (59%), and support staff (55%). FPs were significantly more likely to have DV training (64% vs 21%), more likely to screen at least high-risk women (79% vs 56%), and more likely to have identified a case of DV (92% vs 40%) than pediatricians. FPs were less likely to cite lack of education (46% vs 65%) and lack of time (50% vs 61%) than pediatricians. Physicians licensed in Ohio were less likely to have specific domestic violence training (23% vs 60%) as compared with Kentucky physicians, where domestic violence education is required for licensing. Kentucky physicians were less likely to cite lack of education as barrier to DV screening (20% vs 62%). When comparing the characteristics of those who screen to those who do not, those with DV training were 10.9 times (odds adjusted ratio) more likely to screen.

Conclusions.  Practitioners grossly underestimate the incidence of DV in their practices. Lack of education including knowledge of screening recommendations is a barrier to DV screening by pediatricians. Greater efforts are needed to educate pediatricians on DV for the AAP recommendations to be accepted.domestic violence, child abuse, screening, physician attitude. .




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Ann Fam MedHome page
P.-H. Chen, S. Rovi, J. Washington, A. Jacobs, M. Vega, K.-Y. Pan, and M. S. Johnson
Randomized Comparison of 3 Methods to Screen for Domestic Violence in Family Practice
Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2007; 5(5): 430 - 435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Interpers ViolenceHome page
J. Thackeray, S. Stelzner, S. M. Downs, and C. Miller
Screening for Intimate Partner Violence: The Impact of Screener and Screening Environment on Victim Comfort
J Interpers Violence, June 1, 2007; 22(6): 659 - 670.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Interpers ViolenceHome page
L. K. Brown, K. L. Puster, E. A. Vazquez, H. L. Hunter, and C. M. Lescano
Screening Practices for Adolescent Dating Violence
J Interpers Violence, April 1, 2007; 22(4): 456 - 464.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Board Fam MedHome page
N. A. Magar, S. Dabova-Missova, and D. K. Gjerdingen
Effectiveness of Targeted Anticipatory Guidance during Well-child Visits: A Pilot Trial
J Am Board Fam Med, September 1, 2006; 19(5): 450 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
R. C. Whitaker, S. M. Orzol, and R. S. Kahn
Maternal Mental Health, Substance Use, and Domestic Violence in the Year After Delivery and Subsequent Behavior Problems in Children at Age 3 Years.
Arch Gen Psychiatry, May 1, 2006; 63(5): 551 - 560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Trauma Violence AbuseHome page
W. E. Thurston and A. C. Eisener
Successful integration and maintenance of screening for domestic violence in the health sector: moving beyond individual responsibility.
Trauma Violence Abuse, April 1, 2006; 7(2): 83 - 92.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
J. F. Knapp, M. D. Dowd, C. S. Kennedy, J. Stallbaumer-Rouyer, and D. P. Henderson
Evaluation of a Curriculum for Intimate Partner Violence Screening in a Pediatric Emergency Department
Pediatrics, January 1, 2006; 117(1): 110 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
M. J. Trowbridge, R. D. Sege, L. Olson, K. O'Connor, E. Flaherty, and H. Spivak
Intentional Injury Management and Prevention in Pediatric Practice: Results From 1998 and 2003 American Academy of Pediatrics Periodic Surveys
Pediatrics, October 1, 2005; 116(4): 996 - 1000.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CLIN PEDIATRHome page
T. Zink, R. Siegel, L. Chen, L. Levin, S. Pabst, and F. Putnam
Physician Knowledge and Management of Children Exposed to Domestic Violence in Ohio: A Comparison of Pediatricians and Family Physicians
Clinical Pediatrics, April 1, 2005; 44(3): 211 - 219.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
T. G. Holtrop, H. Fischer, S. M. Gray, K. Barry, T. Bryant, and W. Du
Screening for Domestic Violence in a General Pediatric Clinic: Be Prepared!
Pediatrics, November 1, 2004; 114(5): 1253 - 1257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
M. D. Kogan, M. A. Schuster, S. M. Yu, C. H. Park, L. M. Olson, M. Inkelas, C. Bethell, P. J. Chung, and N. Halfon
Routine Assessment of Family and Community Health Risks: Parent Views and What They Receive
Pediatrics, June 1, 2004; 113(6/S1): 1934 - 1943.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ANN INTERN MEDHome page
H. D. Nelson, P. Nygren, Y. McInerney, and J. Klein
Screening Women and Elderly Adults for Family and Intimate Partner Violence: A Review of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Ann Intern Med, March 2, 2004; 140(5): 387 - 396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann Fam MedHome page
P. Nygren, H. D. Nelson, and J. Klein
Screening Children for Family Violence: A Review of the Evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force
Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2004; 2(2): 161 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CLIN PEDIATRHome page
J. Anderst, T. D. Hill, and R. M. Siegel
A Comparison of Domestic Violence Screening Methods in a Pediatric Office
Clinical Pediatrics, January 1, 2004; 43(1): 103 - 105.
[PDF]

Home page
 CLIN PEDIATRHome page
R. M. Siegel, E. C. Joseph, S. A. Routh, S. G. Mendel, E. Jones, R. B. Ramesh, and T. D. Hill
Screening for Domestic Violence in the Pediatric Office: A Multipractice Experience
Clinical Pediatrics, September 1, 2003; 42(7): 599 - 602.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
P. Klass
Pediatrics by the Book: Pediatricians and Literacy Promotion
Pediatrics, November 1, 2002; 110(5): 989 - 995.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
I. W. Borowsky and M. Ireland
Parental Screening for Intimate Partner Violence by Pediatricians and Family Physicians
Pediatrics, September 1, 2002; 110(3): 509 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
R. P. Berger, D. Bogen, T. Dulani, and E. Broussard
Implementation of a Program to Teach Pediatric Residents and Faculty About Domestic Violence
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, August 1, 2002; 156(8): 804 - 810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
G. Lapidus, M. B. Cooke, E. Gelven, K. Sherman, M. Duncan, and L. Banco
A Statewide Survey of Domestic Violence Screening Behaviors Among Pediatricians and Family Physicians
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, April 1, 2002; 156(4): 332 - 336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
R. B. McFee, J. A. Turano, S. Roberts, J. G. Silverman, A. Raj, L. Mucci, and J. Hathaway
Risk Factors for Dating Violence in Adolescents
JAMA, December 12, 2001; 286(22): 2813 - 2813.
[Full Text] [PDF]