PEDIATRICS Vol. 108 No. 1 July 2001, pp. 8-12
Received May 1, 2000; accepted Oct 13, 2000.
, and
From the * Mayo Medical School and Objective. Inherited long QT syndrome
(LQTS) may present with syncope, seizures, and/or sudden death as a
result of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Identification of family
members who are at risk because they harbor the genetic substrate for
LQTS is critical. Presently, such identification relies on the 12-lead
electrocardiogram (ECG). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the
efficacy of the automated ECG as a screening tool for LQTS.
Method. Molecular testing of a proband and 22 additional
family members for the KVLQT1 mutation and symptomatic status
facilitated the classification of each family member into the following
patient groups: noncarriers (13), asymptomatic carriers (5), and
symptomatic carriers (5). Each individual had a standard 12-lead ECG
from which the computer and manual (lead II) corrected QT interval were
determined. In addition, we determined the accuracy of the computer ECG
diagnostic interpretation for each patient group.
Results. With the use of a corrected QT interval of Conclusion. Reliance on the computer-generated ECG
diagnostic interpretation alone will fail to identify many at-risk
family members. It is suggested that all first-degree relatives of an
identified LQTS proband have a 12-lead ECG that is reviewed
independently by a physician who is familiar with LQTS in an effort to
improve screening for this potentially lethal syndrome.electrocardiogram, long QT syndrome, QT interval, sudden death.
Department of Pediatric
and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Mayo Eugenio
Litta Children's Hospital, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester,
Minnesota.
460
ms as a diagnostic cutoff, the positive and negative predictive values
for identifying at-risk individuals were 100%. Despite this, the
computer-generated ECG diagnostic interpretation erroneously classified
6 of 23 family members. Moreover, half of the family members, proved to
have the ion channel defect, received the diagnostic interpretation "normal ECG."
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Monnig, L. Eckardt, H. Wedekind, W. Haverkamp, J. Gerss, P. Milberg, K. Wasmer, P. Kirchhof, G. Assmann, G. Breithardt, et al. Electrocardiographic risk stratification in families with congenital long QT syndrome Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2006; 27(17): 2074 - 2080. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Darpo, M. Agin, D. J. Kazierad, G. Layton, G. Muirhead, P. Gray, and D. K. Jorkasky Man Versus Machine: Is There an Optimal Method for QT Measurements in Thorough QT Studies? J. Clin. Pharmacol., June 1, 2006; 46(6): 598 - 612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Vyas, J. Hejlik, and M. J. Ackerman Epinephrine QT Stress Testing in the Evaluation of Congenital Long-QT Syndrome: Diagnostic Accuracy of the Paradoxical QT Response Circulation, March 21, 2006; 113(11): 1385 - 1392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. White and B. F. McBride Electrocardiographic Effects of a Dietary Supplement Containing Ephedra and Caffeine--Reply JAMA, September 28, 2005; 294(12): 1487 - 1488. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Krovetz, M. J Ackerman, and C.-b. J Porter Diagnostic Accuracy of Screening Electrocardiograms in the Long QT Syndrome Pediatrics, May 1, 2002; 109(5): 985 - 985. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||