This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Streiner, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenbaum, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Streiner, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenbaum, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Premature & Newborn

PEDIATRICS Vol. 108 No. 1 July 2001, pp. 152-157

Attitudes of Parents and Health Care Professionals Toward Active Treatment of Extremely Premature Infants

Received Oct 24, 2000; accepted Jan 22, 2001.

David L. Streiner*, Saroj SaigalDagger , Elizabeth BurrowsDagger , Barbara StoskopfDagger , and Peter RosenbaumDagger

From the * Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto; and Dagger  Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Objectives.  To compare the attitudes of neonatologists, neonatal nurses, the parents of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) children, and the parents of normal birth weight children toward saving infants of borderline viability and who should be involved in the decision-making process and to compare physicians' and nurses' estimates of the proportion of infants who are born at various gestational ages with regard to survival, morbidity, and treatment.

Methods.  A questionnaire was given to 169 parents of ELBW children and 123 parents of term children, who were part of a longitudinal study of the outcome of ELBW infants. A similar questionnaire was completed by 98 Canadian neonatologists and 99 neonatal nurses.

Results.  Physicians tended to be more optimistic than nurses regarding the probability of survival and freedom from serious disabilities and would recommend to parents life-saving interventions for their child at earlier gestational ages. A significant majority of parents believed that attempts should be made to save all infants, irrespective of condition or weight at birth, compared with only 6% of health professionals who endorsed this. In contrast to parents, health professionals believed that economic costs to society should be a factor in deciding whether to save an ELBW infant. However, health professionals did not believe that the economic status of the parents should be a factor, although the stress of raising an infant with disabilities should be. Most respondents believed that the parents and physicians should make the final decision but that other bodies, such as ethics committees or the courts, should not.

Conclusion.  Health care professionals must recognize that their attitudes toward saving ELBW infants differ from those of parents. Parents, whether of term or extremely premature children, are more in favor of intervening to save the infant irrespective of its weight or condition at birth than are professionals. It therefore is imperative that there be joint decision making, combining the knowledge of the physician with the wishes of the parents.  Key words:  ELBW, decision making, survival, interventions.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PediatricsHome page
M. F. Haward, R. O. Murphy, and J. M. Lorenz
Message Framing and Perinatal Decisions
Pediatrics, July 1, 2008; 122(1): 109 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
M. P. McGraw and J. M. Perlman
Attitudes of Neonatologists Toward Delivery Room Management of Confirmed Trisomy 18: Potential Factors Influencing a Changing Dynamic
Pediatrics, June 1, 2008; 121(6): 1106 - 1110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
J. Ohlinger, A. Kantak, J. P. Lavin Jr, O. Fofah, E. Hagen, G. Suresh, L. P. Halamek, and J. A. Schriefer
Evaluation and Development of Potentially Better Practices for Perinatal and Neonatal Communication and Collaboration
Pediatrics, November 1, 2006; 118(Supplement_2): S147 - S152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
J. P. Lavin Jr, A. Kantak, J. Ohlinger, J. W. Kaempf, M. Tomlinson, B. Campbell, O. Fofah, W. Edwards, K. Allbright, E. Hagen, et al.
Attitudes of Obstetric and Pediatric Health Care Providers Toward Resuscitation of Infants Who Are Born at the Margins of Viability
Pediatrics, November 1, 2006; 118(Supplement_2): S169 - S176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Law Med EthicsHome page
S. A. Sayeed
The Marginally Viable Newborn: Legal Challenges, Conceptual Inadequacies, and Reasonableness
J. Law Med. Ethics, September 1, 2006; 34(3): 600 - 610.
[PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
R. Hentschel, K. Lindner, M. Krueger, and S. Reiter-Theil
Restriction of Ongoing Intensive Care in Neonates: A Prospective Study
Pediatrics, August 1, 2006; 118(2): 563 - 569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
A. Janvier and K. J. Barrington
Advocating for the Very Preterm Infant
Pediatrics, July 1, 2006; 118(1): 429 - 430.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
J. M. Peerzada, J. Schollin, and S. Hakansson
Delivery room decision-making for extremely preterm infants in Sweden.
Pediatrics, June 1, 2006; 117(6): 1988 - 1995.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
J L Watts and S Saigal
Outcome of extreme prematurity: as information increases so do the dilemmas.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2006; 91(3): F221 - F225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
S. B. Morse, S. S. Wu, C. Ma, M. Ariet, M. Resnick, and J. Roth
Racial and Gender Differences in the Viability of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants: A Population-Based Study
Pediatrics, January 1, 2006; 117(1): e106 - e112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
J. C. Partridge, A. M. Martinez, H. Nishida, N.-Y. Boo, K. W. Tan, C.-Y. Yeung, J.-H. Lu, and V. Y.H. Yu
International Comparison of Care for Very Low Birth Weight Infants: Parents' Perceptions of Counseling and Decision-Making
Pediatrics, August 1, 2005; 116(2): e263 - e271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
H. T. Keenan, M. W. Doron, and B. A. Seyda
Comparison of Mothers' and Counselors' Perceptions of Predelivery Counseling for Extremely Premature Infants
Pediatrics, July 1, 2005; 116(1): 104 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
D. Wilson-Costello, H. Friedman, N. Minich, A. A. Fanaroff, and M. Hack
Improved Survival Rates With Increased Neurodevelopmental Disability for Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants in the 1990s
Pediatrics, April 1, 2005; 115(4): 997 - 1003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
F. Blanco, G. Suresh, D. Howard, and R. F. Soll
Ensuring Accurate Knowledge of Prematurity Outcomes for Prenatal Counseling
Pediatrics, April 1, 2005; 115(4): e478 - e487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
J. Kattwinkel and R. Boyle
Is the Glass 10% Empty or 90% Full?
Pediatrics, June 1, 2004; 113(6): 1846 - 1847.
[Full Text]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
S. Saigal, B. L. Stoskopf, E. Burrows, D. L. Streiner, and P. L. Rosenbaum
Stability of Maternal Preferences for Pediatric Health States in the Perinatal Period and 1 Year Later
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, March 1, 2003; 157(3): 261 - 269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JWatch Women's HealthHome page
Differing Perspectives on Interventions for Extremely Premature Infants
Journal Watch Women's Health, September 6, 2001; 2001(906): 5 - 5.
[Full Text]