PEDIATRICS Vol. 107 No. 6 June 2001, p. e92
Received Jul 3, 2000; accepted Jan 24, 2001.

From the * School of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of
Surrey, Surrey, United Kingdom; and Objective. To examine the
relationship between pulmonary function, nutritional status, body
image, and eating attitudes in children with cystic fibrosis (CF)
compared with healthy controls.
Method. Seventy-six children with CF (39 girls) and 153 healthy control children (82 girls) were recruited. All children were
between 7 and 12 years of age. After being weighed and measured,
participants undertook a structured 1-to-1 interview. Four measures
were used to assess body image: body size (perception and satisfaction) were ascertained using the Children's Body Image Scale (CBIS), which
uses photographs of children of various body mass index (BMI)
representative of the range of BMI percentiles for children 7 to 12 years of age. Body size satisfaction was measured by the response to
the questions, "Do you think your body is 1) much too thin, 2) too
thin, 3) just right, 4) too fat, and 5) much too fat?" Body weight
satisfaction was measured by the question, "Would you like your body
to be 1) much thinner, 2) a little bit thinner, 3) stay the same, 4) a
little bit fatter, and 5) much fatter?" Global self-esteem was
measured using the children's version of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem
Scale and Body Esteem Scale using a 24-item scale. Dieting behavior was
measured by asking directly about previous weight control behaviors,
use of the Dutch Eating Behavior-Restraint Scale (DEBQ-R), and, in
children who acknowledged previous dieting behavior, the Children's
Eating Attitude Test (ChEAT) was additionally administered.
Results. Both girls and boys with CF had significantly
reduced BMI percentiles compared with control children. Boys with CF
did not have a significantly different BMI compared with girls with CF. There were significant positive correlations between forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (% of predicted) and BMI
percentile in girls (r = .35) and boys (r = .50) with CF. Body image perceptions in boys and girls with CF were
examined in relation to the healthy control group using 2 (CF and
control groups) by 2 (male and female) analysis of variance. The
interaction effect was examined to explore the prediction that girls
compared with boys with CF would have greater acceptance of their body
shape and less desire to become larger. There were no differences
between groups or sex in body esteem. On the CBIS body dissatisfaction
score, children with CF were significantly more likely to perceive
their ideal body size as a little larger than their current size while
control children desired a smaller body size than their current size. CF children had a significantly lower mean score for body size satisfaction (an item assessing perception being too thin) and a
significantly higher mean score on body weight satisfaction. There was
a significant main effect of gender for only 1 measure, difference
between the CBIS body dissatisfaction score, with girls being more
likely to nominate a smaller ideal than their current figure. There
were no significant interaction effects. Of children with CF and a low BMI ( Discussion. Children with CF had very similar body esteem
and general self-esteem as controls. A consideration of body image
constructs does reveal group differences between perception and
satisfaction with body size between groups. Children with CF were more
likely to perceive their body size as larger than it actually was and have greater satisfaction with their current body size in contrast to
control children. The girls and boys with CF with a higher BMI
frequently selected a smaller body size as their ideal. Control children displayed a large degree of body dissatisfaction, selecting an
ideal figure smaller than their own and the desire to be thinner. Given
the likely positive health consequences of being larger, it is
encouraging that children with CF are not adopting the desire to be
thinner, widely held by their healthy peers. However, this may be
attributable to the fact that CF children are thinner than average and
so fit the prevailing body shape ideal. These analyses do not support
the prediction that more girls with CF would be satisfied with their
body size compared with boys but do provide information of clinical
importance as it indicates that some children with CF, although
perceiving themselves to be thin, do not necessarily wish to be any
fatter and they may not be motivated to eat the high-energy diet
recommended. Clinicians need to be aware of the possibility that
medical targets for growth for individuals may not be in
concordance with their desires and determining the child's point of
view may be helpful in identifying an appropriate individual intervention. The finding that body dissatisfaction is an independent predictor of nutritional status (BMI) in controls and girls with CF
suggests children's own concepts of their body size is important. Encouraging positive body and self-esteem and focusing attention away
from weight gain and more toward achieving optimum growth may be a
useful strategy for clinicians working with this population.
Department of Psychology,
University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
10th percentile), 25% of
girls and 38% of boys thought they were too thin. Fewer girls (19%)
than boys (38%) would have liked to be fatter. The CF group had significantly lower mean scores on the DEBQ-R
scale compared with controls. Of the children with CF completing the
ChEAT (n = 13), none obtained a score of clinical
significance compared with 6 (4%) for controls. To examine predictors of BMI a multiple regression analysis was
conducted separately for boys and girls with CF and control boys and
girls in which the dependent variable was BMI and the independent
variables were FEV1 (% of predicted) (in CF children only), body esteem, self-esteem, and body dissatisfaction score. In the
case of boys with CF, the regression equation was significant (Adjusted
R2 = 0.30). In the case of girls with CF, the
regression equation was significant (Adjusted
R2 = 0.25) with body dissatisfaction making a
significant independent contribution. For control boys the regression
equation was significant (Adjusted R2 = 0.18).
Variables making a significant contribution to the equation were body
esteem and body dissatisfaction. Finally, for control girls the
regression equation was significant (Adjusted
R2 = 0.13). The only variable to make a
significant contribution to the equation was body dissatisfaction.