This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ingram, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ingram, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ingram, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ingram, D. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Infectious Disease & Immunity
Right arrowRelated AAP Red Book topics:
Gonococcal Infections
Chlamydial Infections
Chlamydia trachomatis

PEDIATRICS Vol. 107 No. 5 May 2001, p. e73

ELECTRONIC ARTICLE:
Risk Assessment for Gonococcal and Chlamydial Infections in Young Children Undergoing Evaluation for Sexual Abuse

Received Feb 10, 2000; accepted Nov 28, 2000.

Daniel M. Ingram*, William C. Miller*, Dagger , Victor J. Schoenbach*, V. Denise Everettparallel , and David L. Ingram§

From the * Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Departments of Dagger  Medicine and § Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and the parallel  Pediatrics Department, Wake Area Health Education Center, WakeMed, Raleigh, North Carolina.

Objective.  Testing for gonorrhea (GC) and chlamydial (Ct) infection in children who are being evaluated for sexual abuse is invasive and costly. We developed selective criteria to limit unnecessary testing for these infections.

Methods.  Over a 10-year period (May 1988 to May 1998), clinical information was collected in a prospectively designed database for all children ages 0 to 12 years by the WakeMed Child Sexual Abuse Team in Raleigh, North Carolina. The study population comprised 3040 (2414 girls and 626 boys) of the 3064 children evaluated for sexual abuse. Children were interviewed, examined, and tested by culture for GC and Ct orally, rectally, and genitally. Information from referral sources, accompanying guardians, and previous recent physical examinations was recorded. Bivariate analyses and logistic regression were used to develop 2 sets of screening criteria to predict children at greatest risk of infection with: 1) GC and/or Ct (GC/Ct) and 2) GC alone.

Results.  Fifty-eight children were identified with GC/Ct infections (37 with GC, 25 with Ct; 4 children were coinfected). The proposed algorithm for GC/Ct infections would have identified all children with these infections, while avoiding testing 56% of children without infection. Using genital cultures only, the proposed risk score for GC/Ct infections would have identified 100% of GC/Ct cases with 85% fewer cultures compared with testing all children with oral, rectal, and genital cultures.

Conclusion.  The use of a risk assessment algorithm for GC and Ct infections may reduce the cost and trauma of testing young children who are being evaluated for sexual abuse. sexual abuse, gonorrhea, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, chlamydia, Chlamydia trachomatis, sexually transmitted diseases, children. .