This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sreenan, C.
Right arrow Articles by Osiovich, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sreenan, C.
Right arrow Articles by Osiovich, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Premature & Newborn
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

PEDIATRICS Vol. 107 No. 5 May 2001, pp. 1081-1083

High-Flow Nasal Cannulae in the Management of Apnea of Prematurity: A Comparison With Conventional Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

Received May 31, 2000; accepted Aug 25, 2000.

Con Sreenan*, Dagger , Robert P. Lemke*, Dagger , Ann Hudson-Mason*, and Horacio Osiovich*, Dagger

From the * Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Royal Alexandra Hospital; and the Dagger  Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Apnea of prematurity (AOP) is frequently managed with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP). Nasal cannula (NC) are used at low flows (<0.5 L/min) to deliver supplemental oxygen to neonates. A number of centers use high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in the management of AOP without measuring the positive distending pressure (PDP) generated.

Objective.  To determine the NC flow required to generate PDP equal to that provided by NCPAP at 6 cm H2O and to assess the effectiveness of HFNC as compared NCPAP in the management of AOP.

Method.  Forty premature infants, gestation 28.7 ± 0.4 weeks (mean ± standard error of mean), postconceptual age at study 30.3 ± 0.6 weeks, birth weight 1256 ± 66 g, study weight 1260 ± 63 g who were being managed with conventional NCPAP for at least 24 hours for clinically significant apnea of prematurity, were enrolled in a trial of ventilator-generated conventional NCPAP versus infant NC at flows of up to 2.5 L/min. End expiratory esophageal pressure was measured on NCPAP and on NC, and the gas flow on NC was adjusted to generate an end expiratory esophageal pressure equal to that measured on NCPAP. Two 6-hour periods were continuously recorded and the data were stored on computer.

Results.  The flow required to generate a comparable PDP with NC varied with the infant's weight and was represented by the equation: flow (L/min) = 0.92 + 0.68x, x = weight in kg, R = 0.72. There was no difference in the frequency and duration of apnea, bradycardia or desaturation per recording between the 2 systems.

Conclusion.  NC at flows of 1 to 2.5 L/min can deliver PDP in premature neonates. HFNC is as effective as NCPAP in the management of AOP.

 Key words:  nasal cannula, apnea of prematurity, positive distending pressure, esophageal pressure, nasal continuous positive airway pressure.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
B. A. BouAram and C. J. Fernandes
Heated, Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy: Yet Another Way to Deliver Continuous Positive Airway Pressure?
Pediatrics, July 1, 2008; 122(1): 218 - 219.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
Z. J. Kubicka, J. Limauro, and R. A. Darnall
Heated, Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy: Yet Another Way to Deliver Continuous Positive Airway Pressure?
Pediatrics, January 1, 2008; 121(1): 82 - 88.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. K. Jackson, S. P. Ford, K. A. Meinert, M. K. Leick-Rude, B. Anderson, M. B. Sheehan, B. M. Haney, S. R. Leeks, and S. D. Simon
Standardizing Nasal Cannula Oxygen Administration in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Pediatrics, November 1, 2006; 118(Supplement_2): S187 - S196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
N. N. Finer
Nasal Cannula Use in the Preterm Infant: Oxygen or Pressure?
Pediatrics, November 1, 2005; 116(5): 1216 - 1217.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
A. Madan, B. S. Brozanski, C. H. Cole, N. L. Oden, G. Cohen, and D. L. Phelps
A Pulmonary Score for Assessing the Severity of Neonatal Chronic Lung Disease
Pediatrics, April 1, 2005; 115(4): e450 - e457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
A G De Paoli, C Morley, and P G Davis
Nasal CPAP for neonates: what do we know in 2003?
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2003; 88(3): F168 - F172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
B Frey and F Shann
Oxygen administration in infants
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., March 1, 2003; 88(2): F84 - F88.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]