PEDIATRICS Vol. 107 No. 5 May 2001, pp. 1029-1036
Examination of State Regulations Regarding Infants and Sleep in Licensed Child Care Centers and Family Child Care Settings
Received Sep 5, 2000; accepted Sep 5, 2000.
,, and
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, SC 29425
From the * Department of General Pediatrics and Adolescent
Medicine, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC;
Department of Pediatrics, George Washington University School of
Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC; and the § Department of
Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Background. Twenty percent of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) occurs in child care settings. Although the incidence of SIDS in the United States has decreased with increased awareness of the risks of prone infant sleeping, smoke exposure, soft bedding, and unsafe sleep environments, avoidance of these risk factors is not universally practiced in child care settings. Advocacy through state child care regulatory agencies and legislative bodies may be effective in more widespread awareness and avoidance of risk factors.
Objective. To determine what individual state regulations for licensed child care centers and family child care settings exist regarding: 1) sleep positions for infants under 6 months old, 2) crib safety, 3) bedding safety, and 4) smoking in the facilities.
Design. A descriptive survey of regulations for licensed child care centers and family child care settings in the 50 states and the District of Columbia.
Results. Fifteen states use regulations adopted before publication of the first policy statement of the American Academy of Pediatrics on infant sleep position and SIDS in 1992. Six states require child care centers to place infants nonprone. Sixty-three percent of states require cribs in child care centers to meet at least 1 safety standard, and 45.1% require this in family child care homes. Six states have provisions limiting the use of soft bedding in child care centers, and 4 have such bans for family child care homes. Seventy-one percent of states prohibit smoking in child care centers during hours of operation; 17% of states have similar requirements for family child care homes.
Conclusions. Many states use child care regulations that were written before the initial policy statements of the American Academy of Pediatrics regarding safe sleep environments for infants. Even those more recently adopted regulations do not adequately address sleep safety for infants. Pediatricians need to become more proactive in promoting safety regulations in child care. Adoption of new regulations can aid in education of child care providers and, thus, improve the safety for infants in child care. Key words: crib safety, prone position, sleep position, smoking regulations, sudden infant death syndrome, child care, intervention.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Facebook 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. E. Benjamin, E. M. Taveras, A. L. Cradock, E. M. Walker, M. M. Slining, and M. W. Gillman State and Regional Variation in Regulations Related to Feeding Infants in Child Care Pediatrics, July 1, 2009; 124(1): e104 - e111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. E. Matt, J. T. Bernert, and M. F. Hovell Measuring Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Children: An Ecological Measurement Approach J. Pediatr. Psychol., March 1, 2008; 33(2): 156 - 175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Y. Moon, L. Kotch, and L. Aird State Child Care Regulations Regarding Infant Sleep Environment Since the Healthy Child Care America-Back to Sleep Campaign Pediatrics, July 1, 2006; 118(1): 73 - 83. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Task Force on Sudden Infant Death Syndrome The Changing Concept of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome: Diagnostic Coding Shifts, Controversies Regarding the Sleeping Environment, and New Variables to Consider in Reducing Risk Pediatrics, November 1, 2005; 116(5): 1245 - 1255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Y. Moon, B. M. Sprague, and K. M. Patel Stable Prevalence but Changing Risk Factors for Sudden Infant Death Syndrome in Child Care Settings in 2001 Pediatrics, October 1, 2005; 116(4): 972 - 977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G A de Jonge, C I Lanting, R Brand, J H Ruys, B A Semmekrot, and J P van Wouwe Sudden infant death syndrome in child care settings in the Netherlands Arch. Dis. Child., May 1, 2004; 89(5): 427 - 430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Y. Moon and R. P. Oden Back to Sleep: Can We Influence Child Care Providers? Pediatrics, October 1, 2003; 112(4): 878 - 882. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. M. Tomashek, J. Hsia, and S. Iyasu Trends in Postneonatal Mortality Attributable to Injury, United States, 1988-1998 Pediatrics, May 1, 2003; 111(5): 1219 - 1225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Y. Moon, D. E. Weese-Mayer, and J. M. Silvestri Nighttime Child Care: Inadequate Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Risk Factor Knowledge, Practice, and Policies Pediatrics, April 1, 2003; 111(4): 795 - 799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
