This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow P3Rs: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barrington, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Finer, N. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barrington, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Finer, N. N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Premature & Newborn

PEDIATRICS Vol. 107 No. 4 April 2001, pp. 638-641

Randomized Trial of Nasal Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation Compared With Continuous Positive Airway Pressure After Extubation of Very Low Birth Weight Infants

Received Jan 20, 2000; accepted Aug 3, 2000.

Keith J. Barrington*, Dale BullDagger , and Neil N. FinerDagger

From the * Department of Pediatrics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada and Dagger  Division of Neonatal/Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California.

Objective.  To determine whether noninvasive, nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (nSIMV) improves the likelihood that very low birth weight infants will be successfully extubated.

Methods.  Infants of <1251-g birth weight who were due to be extubated before 6 weeks of age were eligible once they were receiving <35% oxygen and were on a ventilator rate of <18 breaths per minute (bpm). Extubation was performed following intravenous loading with aminophylline, after a successful trial of 12 hours of endotracheal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation at a rate of 8. Infants were randomized to either nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) at 6 cm H2O or nSIMV after extubation. nSIMV was commenced at a rate of 12 bpm with pressure on the ventilator set to achieve a delivered pressure of at least 12 cm H2O and a peak end expiratory pressure of 6 cm H2O. Continuous recording for diagnosis of apnea was performed for 72 hours after extubation. Objective criteria for failure of extubation were as follows: a PaCO2 >70; FIO2 >0.7; or severe recurrent apnea (>2 apneas requiring intermittent positive-pressure ventilation in 24 hours or >6 apneas >20 seconds per day). The study ended after 72 hours postextubation or when infants satisfied failure criteria. A sample size of 54 was determined by power analysis.

Results.  Mean birth weight (831 standard deviation [SD]: 193 g) and gestation (26.3 SD: 1.8 weeks) did not differ between groups. Mean age at extubation was 7.6 (SD: 9.7) days, range 1 to 40 days. The nSIMV group had a lower incidence of failed extubation 4/27 compared with the continuous positive airway pressure group, 12/27. This was attributable to both a decreased incidence of apnea and a decreased incidence of hypercarbia. There was no increase in the incidence of abdominal distension or feeding intolerance.

Discussion.  nSIMV is effective in preventing extubation failure in very low birth weight infants in the first 72 hours after extubation. Noninvasive ventilation may have other roles in the care of the very low birth weight infant.  Key words:  extubation, premature infant, randomized trial, continuous positive airways pressure, noninvasive ventilation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
E. C. Eichenwald and A. R. Stark
Management and Outcomes of Very Low Birth Weight
N. Engl. J. Med., April 17, 2008; 358(16): 1700 - 1711.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
A A Hutchison and S Bignall
Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in the preterm neonate: reducing endotrauma and the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., January 1, 2008; 93(1): F64 - F68.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
N. Claure and E. Bancalari
New modes of mechanical ventilation in the preterm newborn: evidence of benefit
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., November 1, 2007; 92(6): F508 - F512.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
L. S Owen, C. J Morley, and P. G Davis
Neonatal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation: what do we know in 2007?
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., September 1, 2007; 92(5): F414 - F418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
F. Moreau-Bussiere, N. Samson, M. St-Hilaire, P. Reix, J. R. Lafond, E. Nsegbe, and J.-P. Praud
Laryngeal response to nasal ventilation in nonsedated newborn lambs
J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2007; 102(6): 2149 - 2157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
N. N. Finer, R. J. Powers, C.-h. S. Ou, D. Durand, D. Wirtschafter, J. B. Gould, and for the California Perinatal Quality Care Collabor
Prospective Evaluation of Postnatal Steroid Administration: A 1-Year Experience From the California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative
Pediatrics, March 1, 2006; 117(3): 704 - 713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
H. Christou and D. Brodsky
Lung Injury and Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Newborn Infants
J Intensive Care Med, March 1, 2005; 20(2): 76 - 87.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
B. M. Stefanescu, W. P. Murphy, B. J. Hansell, M. Fuloria, T. M. Morgan, and J. L. Aschner
A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Two Different Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Systems for the Successful Extubation of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants
Pediatrics, November 1, 2003; 112(5): 1031 - 1038.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
A G De Paoli, C Morley, and P G Davis
Nasal CPAP for neonates: what do we know in 2003?
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2003; 88(3): F168 - F172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. K. Jackson, J. Vellucci, P. Johnson, and H. W. Kilbride
Evidence-Based Approach to Change in Clinical Practice: Introduction of Expanded Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use in an Intensive Care Nursery
Pediatrics, April 1, 2003; 111(4): e542 - 547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Nurs.Home page
Other Articles Noted
Evid. Based Nurs., October 1, 2001; 4(4): E1 - 11.
[Full Text] [PDF]

P3Rs:

Read all P3Rs

Invasive, less invasive or noninvasive - it's not only a question of definition.
Yoram A Bental
Pediatrics Online, 4 Apr 2001 [Full text]
Response to Dr Bental
Keith J Barrington
Pediatrics Online, 10 Apr 2001 [Full text]
Untitled
Osama Ebesh
Pediatrics Online, 24 May 2001 [Full text]