This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Racadio, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, B. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Racadio, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, B. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Premature & Newborn

PEDIATRICS Vol. 107 No. 2 February 2001, p. e28

ELECTRONIC ARTICLE:
Pediatric Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Complication Rates Related to Catheter Tip Location

Received Jun 8, 2000; accepted Sep 13, 2000.

John M. Racadio*, Darcy A. DoellmanDagger , Neil D. Johnson*, Judy A. Bean§, and Brian R. Jacobsparallel

From the Departments of * Radiology, Dagger  Home Health Care, § Biostatistics, and parallel  Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Objective.  To compare complication rates between central venous catheter tip location and noncentral tip location after peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement in children.

Methods.  Between 1994 and 1998, data from all children who underwent PICC placement were analyzed. Patient demographics, catheter characteristics, catheter duration, infusate composition, and catheter complications were entered prospectively into a computerized database. Catheter tip locations were determined by fluoroscopy and were defined as central if they resided in the superior vena cava, right atrium, or high inferior vena cava at or above the level of the diaphragm, and as noncentral if located elsewhere. Differences in complication rates between the central and noncentral groups were analyzed.

Results.  Data from a total of 1266 PICCs were analyzed from 1053 patients with a mean age of 6.49 ± .2 years (range: 0-45.0 years). Of the 1266 PICCs, 1096 (87%) were central in tip location, and 170 (13%) were noncentral in tip location. The central group had 42 complications of 1096 catheters (3.8%), while the noncentral group had 49 complications of 170 catheters (28.8%). Controlling for patient age, catheter size, gender, and catheter duration with a logistic regression model, there remained a statistically significant increased likelihood of complication in the noncentral group versus the central group (adjusted odds ratio: 8.28; 95% confidence interval: 5.11-13.43).

Conclusions.  Centrally placed catheter tips are associated with fewer complications than are noncentrally placed catheter tips. Clinicians should ensure that catheter tips reside centrally after PICC placement in infants and children.  Key words:  catheters, complications, PICC, central venous, children, infants, phlebitis, occlusion.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 AAP Grand RoundsHome page
S. L. Bratton
Catheter-Related Blood Infections in the ICU
AAP Grand Rounds, January 1, 2004; 11(1): 9 - 9.
[Full Text] [PDF]