This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Courtney, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Habib, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Courtney, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Habib, R. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Premature & Newborn
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

PEDIATRICS Vol. 107 No. 2 February 2001, pp. 304-308

Lung Recruitment and Breathing Pattern During Variable Versus Continuous Flow Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Premature Infants: An Evaluation of Three Devices

Received Jan 31, 2000; accepted May 30, 2000.

Sherry E. Courtney*, Kee H. Pyon*, Judy G. Saslow*, Gerald K. ArnoldDagger , Paresh B. Pandit*, and Robert H. Habib§

From the * Robert Wood Johnson Medical School at Camden and the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, the Children's Regional Hospital at Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center, Camden, New Jersey; Dagger  American College of Physicians and American Society of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and § Mercy Children's Hospital at St Vincent's Mercy Medical Center and the Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Ohio, Toledo, Ohio.

Objective.  To determine whether lung volume changes and breathing pattern parameters differ among 3 devices for delivery of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in premature infants.

Methods.  Thirty-two premature infants receiving nasal CPAP for apnea or mild respiratory distress were enrolled. Birth weight was (mean ± standard deviation) 1081 ± 316 g, gestational age 29 ± 2 weeks, age at study 13 ± 12 days, and fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) at study .29 ± .1. Three devices, applied in random order, were studied in each infant: continuous flow nasal CPAP via CPAP prongs, continuous flow nasal CPAP via modified nasal cannula, and variable flow nasal CPAP. After lung recruitment to standardize volume history, changes in lung volume (Delta VL) were assessed at nasal CPAP of 8, 6, 4, and 0 cm H2O using calibrated direct current-coupled respiratory inductance plethysmography.

Results.  Delta VL was significantly greater overall with the variable flow device compared with both the nasal cannula and CPAP prongs. However, Delta VL was not different between the cannula and the prongs. Respiratory rate, tidal volume, thoraco-abdominal asynchrony, and FIO2 were greater with the modified cannula than for either of the other 2 devices.

Conclusion.  Compared with 2 continuous flow devices, the variable flow nasal CPAP device leads to greater lung recruitment. Although a nasal cannula is able to recruit lung volume, it does so at the cost of increased respiratory effort and FIO2.  Key words:  nasal CPAP, lung volume changes, preterm infants, respiratory inductance plethysmography.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
T Pantalitschka, J Sievers, M S Urschitz, T Herberts, C Reher, and C F Poets
Randomised crossover trial of four nasal respiratory support systems for apnoea of prematurity in very low birthweight infants
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., July 1, 2009; 94(4): F245 - F248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. Engoren, S. E. Courtney, and R. H. Habib
Effect of weight and age on respiratory complexity in premature neonates
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2009; 106(3): 766 - 773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
A A Hutchison and S Bignall
Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in the preterm neonate: reducing endotrauma and the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., January 1, 2008; 93(1): F64 - F68.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
A. G. Buckmaster, G. Arnolda, I. M. R. Wright, J. P. Foster, and D. J. Henderson-Smart
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy for Infants With Respiratory Distress in Non-Tertiary Care Centers: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Pediatrics, September 1, 2007; 120(3): 509 - 518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
H. Boumecid, T. Rakza, A. Abazine, S. Klosowski, R. Matran, and L. Storme
Influence of three nasal continuous positive airway pressure devices on breathing pattern in preterm infants
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., July 1, 2007; 92(4): F298 - F300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
N. N. Finer
Nasal Cannula Use in the Preterm Infant: Oxygen or Pressure?
Pediatrics, November 1, 2005; 116(5): 1216 - 1217.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
M. Walsh, W. Engle, A. Laptook, S. N. J. Kazzi, S. Buchter, M. Rasmussen, Q. Yao, and for the National Institute of Child Health and Hum
Oxygen Delivery Through Nasal Cannulae to Preterm Infants: Can Practice Be Improved?
Pediatrics, October 1, 2005; 116(4): 857 - 861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
B. M. Stefanescu, W. P. Murphy, B. J. Hansell, M. Fuloria, T. M. Morgan, and J. L. Aschner
A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Two Different Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Systems for the Successful Extubation of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants
Pediatrics, November 1, 2003; 112(5): 1031 - 1038.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. H. Habib, K. H. Pyon, S. E. Courtney, and Z. H. Aghai
Spectral characteristics of airway opening and chest wall tidal flows in spontaneously breathing preterm infants
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2003; 94(5): 1933 - 1940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
A G De Paoli, C Morley, and P G Davis
Nasal CPAP for neonates: what do we know in 2003?
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2003; 88(3): F168 - F172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
A G De Paoli, C J Morley, P G Davis, R Lau, and E Hingeley
In vitro comparison of nasal continuous positive airway pressure devices for neonates
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., July 1, 2002; 87(1): F42 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
P. B. Pandit, S. E. Courtney, K. H. Pyon, J. G. Saslow, and R. H. Habib
Work of Breathing During Constant- and Variable-Flow Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Neonates
Pediatrics, September 1, 2001; 108(3): 682 - 685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]