This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Connor, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by the ALSPAC Study Team,
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Connor, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by the ALSPAC Study Team,
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice

PEDIATRICS Vol. 106 No. 5 November 2000, p. e68

ELECTRONIC ARTICLE:
Distribution of Accidents, Injuries, and Illnesses by Family Type

Received Sep 7, 1999; accepted Jun 13, 2000.

Thomas G. O'Connor*, Lisa Davies*, Judy Dunn*, Jean Golding, and the ALSPAC Study Team

From the * Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Research Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, London, United Kingdom; and the Institute of Child Health, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Objective.  To investigate whether family type and psychosocial risks indexed by family type were systematically associated with differences in health outcomes in children.

Design and Subjects.  The study is based on a longitudinal, prospective study of a large (n = ~10 000) community sample of families, the Avon Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood.

Main Outcome Measures.  Frequency of accidents, illnesses, and medical interventions.

Results.  At 2 years of age, children in single-parent and stepfamilies were disproportionately likely to experience accidents and receive medical treatment for physical illnesses. In addition, children in single-parent families and stepfamilies were more likely to be hospitalized or receive attention from a hospital doctor for an injury or illness. Exposure to psychosocial risks also were elevated in single-parent families and stepfamilies, compared with intact or nonstepfamilies, and these factors primarily accounted for the connection between family type and children's physical health.

Conclusions.  The consequences of family transitions on children's health extend beyond traditional mental health and behavioral outcomes and include accident proneness, illness, and receipt of medical attention. The mediating processes are not entirely attributable to social class differences connected to family type and may instead be associated with a range of psychosocial risks that are more frequently found in single-parent families and stepfamilies, compared with intact or nonstepfamilies. Prevention and intervention efforts directed toward children at risk for poor behavioral and mental health adjustment secondary to family disruption should consider children's physical health and health-related behaviors.  Key words:  family type, childhood, accidents, injuries, illnesses.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Pediatr PsycholHome page
D. C. Schwebel and C. M. Brezausek
Chronic Maternal Depression and Children's Injury Risk
J. Pediatr. Psychol., May 12, 2008; (2008) jsn046v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
B. D. Johnston
Understanding shared injury risk on the family farm.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, November 1, 2006; 160(11): 1180 - 1181.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Pediatr PsycholHome page
R. Rowe, B. Maughan, and R. Goodman
Childhood Psychiatric Disorder and Unintentional Injury: Findings from a National Cohort Study
J. Pediatr. Psychol., March 1, 2004; 29(2): 119 - 130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]