This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christian, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Joffe, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Christian, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Joffe, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Adolescent Medicine

PEDIATRICS Vol. 106 No. 1 July 2000, pp. 100-104

Forensic Evidence Findings in Prepubertal Victims of Sexual Assault

Received Oct 22, 1999; accepted Jan 26, 2000.

Cindy W. Christian*, Dagger , §, Jane M. Lavelle*, Dagger , parallel , Allan R. De Jong, John Loiselle, Lewis Brenner#, and Mark Joffe*, Dagger , parallel

From * University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Dagger  Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Divisions of § General Pediatrics, parallel  Emergency Medicine, and  Pediatrics, Alfred I duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, Delaware; and # Philadelphia Police Department, Criminalistics Laboratory, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Objective.  The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends forensic evidence collection when sexual abuse has occurred within 72 hours, or when there is bleeding or acute injury. It is not known whether these recommendations are appropriate for prepubertal children, because few data exist regarding the utility of forensic evidence collection in cases of child sexual assault. This study describes the epidemiology of forensic evidence findings in prepubertal victims of sexual assault.

Methods.  The medical records of 273 children <10 years old who were evaluated in hospital emergency departments in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and had forensic evidence processed by the Philadelphia Police Criminalistics Laboratory were retrospectively reviewed for history, physical examination findings, forensic evidence collection, and forensic results.

Results.  Some form of forensic evidence was identified in 24.9% of children, all of whom were examined within 44 hours of their assault. Over 90% of children with positive forensic evidence findings were seen within 24 hours of their assault. The majority of forensic evidence (64%) was found on clothing and linens, yet only 35% of children had clothing collected for analysis. After 24 hours, all evidence, with the exception of 1 pubic hair, was recovered from clothing or linens. No swabs taken from the child's body were positive for blood after 13 hours or sperm/semen after 9 hours. A minority of children (23%) had genital injuries. Genital injury and a history of ejaculation provided by the child were associated with an increased likelihood of identifying forensic evidence, but several children had forensic evidence found that was unanticipated by the child's history.

Conclusions.  The general guidelines for forensic evidence collection in cases of acute sexual assault are not well-suited for prepubertal victims. The decision to collect evidence is best made by the timing of the examination. Swabbing the child's body for evidence is unnecessary after 24 hours. Clothing and linens yield the majority of evidence and should be pursued vigorously for analysis.  Key words:  child abuse, sexual abuse, forensic evidence, sperm, semen.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AAP Grand RoundsHome page
R. I. Paul
Forensic Examinations in Sexually Abused Children and Adolescents
AAP Grand Rounds, December 1, 2006; 16(6): 64 - 64.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Journal of School NursingHome page
L. Edinburgh, E. Saewyc, and C. Levitt
Gender Differences in Extrafamilial Sexual Abuse Experiences Among Young Teens
The Journal of School Nursing, October 1, 2006; 22(5): 278 - 284.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
K. L. Young, J. G. Jones, T. Worthington, P. Simpson, and P. H. Casey
Forensic Laboratory Evidence in Sexually Abused Children and Adolescents
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, June 1, 2006; 160(6): 585 - 588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
R. Girardet, L. Giacobbe, K. Bolton, S. Lahoti, and M. McNeese
Unmet Health Care Needs Among Children Evaluated for Sexual Assault
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, January 1, 2006; 160(1): 70 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
N. Kellogg and and the Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect
The Evaluation of Sexual Abuse in Children
Pediatrics, August 1, 2005; 116(2): 506 - 512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
N. D. Kellogg, S. W. Menard, and A. Santos
Genital Anatomy in Pregnant Adolescents: "Normal" Does Not Mean "Nothing Happened"
Pediatrics, January 1, 2004; 113(1): e67 - 69.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
P. J. Fagan, T. N. Wise, C. W. Schmidt Jr, and F. S. Berlin
Pedophilia
JAMA, November 20, 2002; 288(19): 2458 - 2465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch Emergency Med.Home page
When Should Pediatric Sexual Assault Victims Undergo Evidence Collection?
Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, September 19, 2000; 2000(919): 3 - 3.
[Full Text]


Home page
JWatch Women's HealthHome page
Investigating Prepubertal Sexual Assault: Check Clothing and Linens
Journal Watch Women's Health, September 5, 2000; 2000(905): 1 - 1.
[Full Text]