PEDIATRICS Vol. 105 No. 5 May 2000, pp. 1110-1114
Rectal Methohexital Sedation for Computed Tomography Imaging of Stable Pediatric Emergency Department Patients
Received Mar 30, 1999; accepted Jul 26, 1999.
,
, and
From the * University of Michigan/St Joseph Mercy
Hospital-Emergency Medicine Residency Program;
Hurley Medical
Center; § University of Michigan Hospital, Children's Emergency
Services; and
St Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Objective. Rapid onset of sleep, brief duration of action, and ease of administration are properties that make rectal methohexital (MXT) an attractive choice for sedating stable pediatric emergency department (ED) patients for computed tomography (CT) imaging.
Methodology. One hundred stable patients between 3 and 60 months of age who presented to any of 3 participating EDs and required sedation to undergo CT scanning were given 25 mg/kg of rectal MXT ~15 minutes before their imaging. Vital signs and oxygen saturation were recorded at regular intervals. Data collected included indication for CT imaging, time to achieve sleep, time to reach discharge criteria, adequacy of sedation, adverse effects, and parental satisfaction.
Results. Ninety-five percent of the patients were adequately sedated with rectal MXT. It took an average of 8 minutes to achieve full sedation and the duration of action averaged 79.3 minutes. Ten percent had transient side effects, but all recovered completely. None required intubation. Parental satisfaction was 90%.
Conclusion. Rectal MXT compares favorably to other methods
of nonintravenous sedation for CT scanning of stable pediatric ED
patients in terms of rapidity of onset and reliability but does cause a significant amount of transient respiratory depression. Its use requires careful monitoring of oxygen saturation and should be used
only in a setting where physicians skilled in airway management are
present. If these requirements are met, it may be a good choice for the
relatively noninvasive sedation of pediatric ED patients undergoing
painless but anxiety-provoking procedures.methohexital, pediatric procedure sedation, rectal administration,
computerized tomography imaging.
.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. P. Cravero and G. T. Blike Review of Pediatric Sedation Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2004; 99(5): 1355 - 1364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Lalwani and T. McGraw Concerns/questions about sedation and computed tomography scans. Pediatrics, September 1, 2001; 108(3): 817 - 817. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Sedik Use of Intravenous Methohexital as a Sedative in Pediatric Emergency Departments Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, June 1, 2001; 155(6): 665 - 668. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Schutzman, P. Barnes, A.-C. Duhaime, D. Greenes, C. Homer, D. Jaffe, R. J. Lewis, T. G. Luerssen, and J. Schunk Evaluation and Management of Children Younger Than Two Years Old With Apparently Minor Head Trauma: Proposed Guidelines Pediatrics, May 1, 2001; 107(5): 983 - 993. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Nguyen, S. B. Greenberg, K. R. Fitzhugh, and C. M. Glasier Pediatric Imaging: Sedation with an Injection Formulation Modified for Rectal Administration Radiology, December 1, 2001; 221(3): 760 - 762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||








