PEDIATRICS Vol. 105 No. 5 May 2000, pp. 1051-1057
A Comparison of Neonatal Mortality Risk Prediction Models in Very Low Birth Weight Infants
Received Jan 19, 1999; accepted Aug 9, 1999.
,,
,
From the * Department of Critical Care Medicine, Children's
National Medical Center, Washington, DC; Research Triangle
Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina; § Department of
Neonatology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC;
Department of Newborn Services, George Washington University Medical
Center, Washington, DC; and ¶ Department of Neonatology, Columbia
Hospital for Women, Washington, DC.
Background. Risk-adjusted severity of illness is frequently used in clinical research and quality assessments. Although there are multiple methods designed for neonates, they have been infrequently compared and some have not been assessed in large samples of very low birth weight (VLBW; <1500 g) infants.
Objectives. To test and compare published neonatal mortality prediction models, including Clinical Risk Index for Babies (CRIB), Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology (SNAP), SNAP-Perinatal Extension (SNAP-PE), Neonatal Therapeutic Interventions Scoring System, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) network model, and other individual admission factors such as birth weight, low Apgar score (<7 at 5 minutes), and small for gestational age status in a cohort of VLBW infants from the Washington, DC area.
Methods. Data were collected on 476 VLBW infants admitted to 8 neonatal intensive care units between October 1994 and February 1997. The calibration (closeness of total observed deaths to the predicted total) of models with published coefficients (SNAP-PE, CRIB, and NICHD) was assessed using the standardized mortality ratio. Discrimination was quantified as the area under the curve (AUC) for the receiver operating characteristic curves. Calibrated models were derived for the current database using logistic regression techniques. Goodness-of-fit of predicted to observed probabilities of death was assessed with the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test.
Results. The calibration of published algorithms applied to our data was poor. The standardized mortality ratios for the NICHD, CRIB, and SNAP-PE models were .65, .56, and .82, respectively. Discrimination of all the models was excellent (range: .863-.930). Surprisingly, birth weight performed much better than in previous analyses, with an AUC of .869. The best models using both 12- and 24-hour postadmission data, significantly outperformed the best model based on birth data only but were not significantly different from each other. The variables in the best model were birth weight, birth weight squared, low 5-minute Apgar score, and SNAP (AUC = .930).
Conclusion. Published models for severity of illness overpredicted hospital mortality in this set of VLBW infants, indicating a need for frequent recalibration. Discrimination for these severity of illness scores remains excellent. Birth variables should be reevaluated as a method to control for severity of illness in predicting mortality. Key words: severity of illness index, neonatal mortality, risk adjustment, infant, very low birth weight, intensive care, neonatal.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Facebook 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  O. Dammann, B. Shah, M. Naples, F. Bednarek, J. Zupancic, E. N. Allred, A. Leviton, and for the ELGAN Study Investigators Interinstitutional Variation in Prediction of Death by SNAP-II and SNAPPE-II Among Extremely Preterm Infants Pediatrics, November 1, 2009; 124(5): e1001 - e1006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N Evans, J Hutchinson, J M Simpson, D Donoghue, B Darlow, D Henderson-Smart, and on behalf of the Australian and New Zealand Neonat Prenatal predictors of mortality in very preterm infants cared for in the Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., January 1, 2007; 92(1): F34 - F40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J Profit, J A F Zupancic, M C McCormick, D K Richardson, G J Escobar, J Tucker, W Tarnow-Mordi, and G Parry Moderately premature infants at Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program in California are discharged home earlier than their peers in Massachusetts and the United Kingdom Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., July 1, 2006; 91(4): F245 - F250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Ambalavanan, W. A. Carlo, G. Bobashev, E. Mathias, B. Liu, K. Poole, A. A. Fanaroff, B. J. Stoll, R. Ehrenkranz, L. L. Wright, et al. Prediction of Death for Extremely Low Birth Weight Neonates Pediatrics, December 1, 2005; 116(6): 1367 - 1373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J S Dorling, D J Field, and B Manktelow Neonatal disease severity scoring systems Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., January 1, 2005; 90(1): F11 - F16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Aly, J. D. Milner, K. Patel, and A. A.E. El-Mohandes Does the Experience With the Use of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Improve Over Time in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants? Pediatrics, September 1, 2004; 114(3): 697 - 702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L Gagliardi, A Cavazza, A Brunelli, M Battaglioli, D Merazzi, F Tandoi, D Cella, G F Perotti, M Pelti, I Stucchi, et al. Assessing mortality risk in very low birthweight infants: a comparison of CRIB, CRIB-II, and SNAPPE-II Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., September 1, 2004; 89(5): F419 - F422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. R. Payne, J. H. Carpenter, G. J. Badger, J. D. Horbar, and J. Rogowski Marginal Increase in Cost and Excess Length of Stay Associated With Nosocomial Bloodstream Infections in Surviving Very Low Birth Weight Infants Pediatrics, August 1, 2004; 114(2): 348 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Chiesa, A. Panero, J. F. Osborn, A. F. Simonetti, and L. Pacifico Diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis: A Clinical and Laboratory Challenge Clin. Chem., February 1, 2004; 50(2): 279 - 287. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Kuhlthau, T. G. G. Ferris, and L. I. Iezzoni Risk Adjustment for Pediatric Quality Indicators Pediatrics, January 1, 2004; 113(1/S1): 210 - 216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Chiesa, G. Pellegrini, A. Panero, J. F. Osborn, F. Signore, M. Assumma, and L. Pacifico C-Reactive Protein, Interleukin-6, and Procalcitonin in the Immediate Postnatal Period: Influence of Illness Severity, Risk Status, Antenatal and Perinatal Complications, and Infection Clin. Chem., January 1, 2003; 49(1): 60 - 68. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A E Cust, B A Darlow, and D A Donoghue Outcomes for high risk New Zealand newborn infants in 1998-1999: a population based, national study Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., January 1, 2003; 88(1): F15 - 22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Richards, P. H. Kennedy, C. J. Krulewitch, B. Wingrove, K. Katz, B. Wesley, C. Feinson, and A. Herman Achieving Success in Poor Urban Minority Community-Based Research: Strategies for Implementing Community-Based Research within an Urban Minority Population Health Promot Pract, July 1, 2002; 3(3): 410 - 420. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A M Heuchan, N Evans, D J Henderson Smart, and J M Simpson Perinatal risk factors for major intraventricular haemorrhage in the Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network, 1995-97 Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., March 1, 2002; 86(2): F86 - F90. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. P. Aylward Methodological Issues in Outcome Studies of At-Risk Infants J. Pediatr. Psychol., January 1, 2002; 27(1): 37 - 45. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. J. Jenkins, K. Gauvreau, J. W. Newburger, T. L. Spray, J. H. Moller, and L. I. Iezzoni Consensus-based method for risk adjustment for surgery for congenital heart disease J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2002; 123(1): 110 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
