PEDIATRICS Vol. 105 No. 2 February 2000, p. e20
ELECTRONIC ARTICLE:
Urinary Tract Infection in Febrile Infants Younger Than Eight
Weeks of Age
Received Jun 14, 1999; accepted Sep 7, 1999.
,
,
,
,
,
, and
From the Departments of * Pediatrics and
Laboratory Medicine,
Mackay Memorial Hospital, and § Taipei Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan.
Objective. To assess the usefulness of laboratory parameters, including peripheral white blood cell (WBC) count, C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and microscopic urinalysis (UA), for identifying febrile infants younger than 8 weeks of age at risk for urinary tract infection (UTI), and comparison of standard UA and hemocytometer WBC counts for predicting the presence of UTI.
Methods. A total of 162 febrile children <8 weeks of age were enrolled in this prospective study. All underwent clinical evaluation and laboratory investigation, including WBC count and differential; ESR; CRP; blood culture; a lumbar puncture for cell count and differential, glucose level, protein level, Gram stain, and culture; and a UA and urine culture. All urine specimens were obtained by suprapubic aspiration and microscopically analyzed with standard UA as well as with hemocytometer WBC counts. Quantitative urine cultures were performed. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, likelihood ratios, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were determined for each of the screening tests.
Results. There were 22 positive urine culture results of
at least 100 colony-forming unit/mL. Eighteen of these 22 patients were
males, and all were uncircumcised. There were significant differences for pyuria
5 WBCs/hpf, pyuria
10 WBC/µL, CRP >20 mg/L, and ESR >30 mm/hour between culture-positive and culture-negative groups (P < .05). The ROC area for hemocytometer WBC
count, standard UA, peripheral WBC count, ESR, and CRP concentration
were .909 ± .045, .791 ± .065, .544 ± .074, .787 ± .060, and .822 ± .036, respectively. The ROC curve analysis
indicates that the CRP, ESR, and standard UA were powerful but
imperfect tools with which to discriminate for UTI in potentially
infected neonates. Hemocytometer WBC counts had the highest
sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and likelihood ratios for
identifying very young infants with positive urine culture results. For
all assessments, hemocytometer WBC counts were significantly different,
compared with the standard urinalysis. ESR, CRP, and peripheral WBC
counts were not helpful in identifying UTI in febrile infants.
Conclusion. UTI had a prevalence of 13.6% in febrile infants <8 weeks of age. The CRP, ESR, and standard UA were imperfect tools in discriminating for UTI, and the sensitivity of these laboratory parameters was relatively low. Hemocytometer WBC count was a significantly better predictor of UTI in febrile infants. Key words: urinary tract infection, standard urinalysis, hemocytometer white blood cell counts, receiver operator characteristic curves.




