PEDIATRICS Vol. 105 No. 2 February 2000, pp. 359-362
Use Assessment of Self-Administered Epinephrine Among Food-Allergic Children and Pediatricians
Received Mar 8, 1999; accepted May 13, 1999.
, and
From the * Division of Allergy and Immunology, Jaffe Food
Allergy Institute and the
Division of Ambulatory Pediatrics,
Department of Pediatrics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New
York.
Background and Objectives. Food allergy is a common cause of anaphylaxis, and early treatment with epinephrine can be life-saving. We sought to determine the ability of families with food allergic children and pediatricians to properly use self-injectable epinephrine.
Methods. We enrolled families of consecutive, food-allergic pediatric patients newly referred to our allergy practice but previously prescribed epinephrine and a sampling of pediatricians. Parents or teenage patients answered a structured questionnaire concerning use of self-injectable epinephrine and demonstrated the use of devices with which they were familiar. Demonstrations were scored in a standard manner.
Results. One hundred one families of food-allergic children (mean age of patients, 6.4 years) were enrolled. Self-injectable epinephrine was prescribed (mean of 2.7 years previously) primarily by pediatricians (n = 46) and allergists (n = 49). Patients were prescribed EpiPen (n = 93), EpiE-Z Pen (n = 11), and Ana-Kit (n = 3). Eighty-six percent of the families responded that they had the device with them "at all times," but only 71% of this group had epinephrine at the visit. Among those with the epinephrine, 10% had devices beyond the labeled expiration date. Thus, only 55% of the 101 families had unexpired epinephrine on-hand at the time of the survey. Among children in school, 77% had the medication available in school, and 81% stated that the school knew the indications for administration. Only 32% of the participants correctly demonstrated the use of the device. Twenty-nine attending pediatricians were enrolled (mean 14 yrs in practice; mean 4 epinephrine prescriptions/year). Familiarity with the devices was as follows: EpiPen (86%), EpiE-Z Pen (17%) and Ana-Kit (7%). Only 24% generally gave patients written materials concerning indications. Overall, 18% were familiar with and able to demonstrate correct use of at least 1 device (21% correctly demonstrated Epi-Pen). Seventeen pediatric residents were enrolled; 65% were familiar with the EpiPen; 36% demonstrated it correctly and only 1 resident was familiar with Ana-Kit.
Conclusions. Many parents of severely food-allergic children, and food-allergic teenagers cannot correctly administer their self-injectable epinephrine and may not have the medication readily available. Pediatricians are not familiar with these devices and may fail to review their use with patients. Improved patient and physician education is needed to ensure proper use of this life-saving medication. Key words: anaphylaxis, food allergy, epinephrine.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y Tse and G Rylance Emergency management of anaphylaxis in children and young people: new guidance from the Resuscitation Council (UK) Arch. Dis. Child. Ed. Pract., August 1, 2009; 94(4): 97 - 101. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Mascarenhas and O M Aszkenasy EpiPen training provided to parents of children with food allergies Arch. Dis. Child., January 1, 2009; 94(1): 76 - 76. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Hu, C. Grbich, and A. Kemp Parental food allergy information needs: a qualitative study Arch. Dis. Child., September 1, 2007; 92(9): 771 - 775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Sicherer, F. E. R. Simons, and the Section on Allergy and Immunology Self-injectable Epinephrine for First-Aid Management of Anaphylaxis Pediatrics, March 1, 2007; 119(3): 638 - 646. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Colver Are the dangers of childhood food allergy exaggerated? BMJ, September 2, 2006; 333(7566): 494 - 496. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Part 14: First Aid Circulation, December 13, 2005; 112(24_suppl): IV-196 - IV-203. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Part 10: First Aid Circulation, November 29, 2005; 112(22_suppl): III-115 - III-125. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Litarowsky, S. O. Murphy, and D. L. Canham Evaluation of an Anaphylaxis Training Program for Unlicensed Assistive Personnel The Journal of School Nursing, October 1, 2004; 20(5): 279 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. R Hayman, J. A Bansal, and A. S Bansal Knowledge about using auto-injectable adrenaline: review of patients' case notes and interviews with general practitioners BMJ, December 6, 2003; 327(7427): 1328 - 1328. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Stadtmauer Food Allergy: Preventing a Fatal Outcome Arch Intern Med, August 11, 2003; 163(15): 1861 - 1862. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Al-Muhsen, A. E. Clarke, and R. S. Kagan Peanut allergy: an overview Can. Med. Assoc. J., May 13, 2003; 168(10): 1279 - 1285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Rainbow and G J Browne Fatal asthma or anaphylaxis? Emerg. Med. J., September 1, 2002; 19(5): 415 - 417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T P Blyth and R Sundrum Adrenaline autoinjectors and schoolchildren: a community based study Arch. Dis. Child., January 1, 2002; 86(1): 26 - 27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J ABAY and D J UNSWORTH Appropriate prescription of epinephrine remains the best available treatment Reply Arch. Dis. Child., December 1, 2001; 85(6): 510i - 510. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Puntis Subsequent reactions were common and often more serious than the initial reactions of children with peanut allergy Evid. Based Med., July 1, 2001; 6(4): 126 - 126. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D J Unsworth Controversy: Adrenaline syringes are vastly over prescribed Arch. Dis. Child., May 1, 2001; 84(5): 410 - 411. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
F. E. R. Simons, X. Gu, L. M. Johnston, and K. J. Simons Can Epinephrine Inhalations Be Substituted for Epinephrine Injection in Children at Risk for Systemic Anaphylaxis? Pediatrics, November 1, 2000; 106(5): 1040 - 1044. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||















