Advertising Disclaimer
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lifschitz, C. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lifschitz, C. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Premature & Newborn
Right arrow Gastrointestinal Tract
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

PEDIATRICS Vol. 105 No. 1 January 2000, p. e4

ELECTRONIC ARTICLE:
Carbohydrate Absorption From Fruit Juices in Infants

Received Mar 13, 1999; accepted Jul 12, 1999.

Carlos H. Lifschitz

From the Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

Objective.  To compare the absorption of carbohydrate in particular from a lower (10 mL/kg-1) quantity than that previously tested, of white grape juice and pear juice after a single feeding and after ingestion twice daily for 2 weeks, and determine their respective effects on stool water content, in healthy infants.

Study Participants.  Twelve healthy, well-nourished infants, 5 to 9 months of age, who were recruited from the general population.

Design/Methods.  Infants underwent a breath hydrogen test after a serving of pear juice. Three to 5 days later, the test was repeated after a serving of white grape juice. Infants were randomly assigned to receive a 10 mL/kg-1 serving of grape juice or pear juice twice daily for 2 weeks. The breath tests were repeated after the ingestion of the juices in the same sequence. With the second breath test with pear juice, a charcoal marker and 20 mg 13C fructose, a stable, nonradioactive isotope, were mixed with the juice. Water content of the stools was compared before and after the 2-week feeding of the juice, and fecal samples were analyzed for 13C enrichment by mass spectrometry.

Results.  After the ingestion of the fruit juices, only 1 infant had an abnormal peak hydrogen (H2; >= 10 ppm), which followed the pear juice. That same infant was the only one who had H2 levels >= 10 ppm after grape juice. There was no significant difference in the peak breath H2 levels after grape juice and pear juice either at the beginning of the study or 2 weeks after taking the juice assigned (2.8 ppm ± 2.9 vs 6.2 ppm ± 9, respectively). The difference in breath H2 response before and after the 2 weeks of fruit juice intake was not significant. Mean (±standard deviation) fecal 13C enrichment at baseline was 3.0 Delta %o (±2.4), which was not significantly different from after 2 weeks of juice intake (2.4 Delta %o [±1.5]), regardless of the juice assigned: 2.7 Delta %o (±1.6) for grape juice and 2.2 Delta %o (±1.5) for pear juice. Mean (±standard deviation) percentage of fecal water at baseline was 24.1% (±5.1), which was not significantly different from after 2 weeks of juice (22.5% [±6]), regardless of the juice received: 21.8% (±5.8) for grape juice and 23.2% (±6.7) for pear juice.

Conclusion.  When either grape or pear juice is administered in a dosage of 10 mL/kg/day, the carbohydrate is well absorbed, produces no adverse gastrointestinal symptoms, and has no effect on stool water in healthy infants.  Key words:  fruit juice, carbohydrate absorption, breath hydrogen test.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?