This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pichichero, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Meade, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pichichero, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Meade, B. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Infectious Disease & Immunity
Right arrowRelated AAP Red Book topics:
Pertussis (Whooping Cough)
Diphtheria
Tetanus (Lockjaw)
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

PEDIATRICS Vol. 105 No. 1 January 2000, p. e11

ELECTRONIC ARTICLE:
Safety and Immunogenicity of Six Acellular Pertussis Vaccines and One Whole-Cell Pertussis Vaccine Given as a Fifth Dose in Four- to Six-Year-Old Children

Received Feb 11, 1999; accepted Jul 21, 1999.

Michael E. Pichichero*, Kathryn M. EdwardsDagger , Edwin L. Anderson§, Margaret B. Rennelsparallel , Janet A. Englund, Diane E. Yerg#, William C. Blackwelder#, Deborah L. Jansen**, and Bruce D. Meade**

From the * Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester; New York; Dagger  Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee; § Department of Medicine, St Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri; parallel  Department of Pediatrics and the Center for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland;  Departments of Microbiology and Immunology and Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; # Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland; and ** Division of Bacterial Products, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Rockville, Maryland.

Objective.  To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of 6 different acellular pertussis vaccines combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids (DTaP) and with 1 licensed whole-cell pertussis vaccine (DTwP) as a fifth dose in children who had previously received the same DTaP, a different DTaP, or DTwP as primary and fourth-dose vaccinations.

Methods.  Healthy 4- to 6-year-old children were enrolled at 5 National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Vaccine Treatment and Evaluation Units to receive a fifth dose of a DTaP or DTwP vaccine. All had been randomly assigned to receive 3 primary doses of DTaP or DTwP at 2, 4, and 6 months and a fourth-dose booster at 15 to 20 months of age as part of earlier National Institutes of Health multicenter acellular pertussis vaccine trials. Parents recorded the occurrence and magnitude of fever, irritability, and injection site redness, swelling, and pain for 3 days after vaccination. Sera obtained before and 1 month after the booster vaccination were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for antibody to pertussis toxin, filamentous hemagglutinin, fimbriae, pertactin, and diphtheria and tetanus toxoid. Safety and/or immunogenicity data are reported for 317 children who received DTaP and 10 children who received DTwP.

Results.  Fever and moderate or severe irritability were uncommon following the fifth dose of DTaP vaccine and were generally less frequent than following the fourth dose. However, for the DTaP vaccine groups, redness, swelling, and pain increased in prevalence compared with the fourth dose. The time course and frequency of reactions following DTaP vaccination were generally similar in children who received the same DTaP, a different DTaP, or DTwP for previous doses in the 5- dose series. No significant differences among the DTaP vaccines were detected in the occurrence of reactions, but the statistical power to detect differences was limited by sample size.Significant increases in antibodies directed against the included antigens were observed for all DTaP vaccines in paired pre- and post-fifth dose sera. Post-fifth dose antibody concentrations differed significantly among the DTaP vaccines. Some children in the study showed an antibody response to an antigen not reported to be in the DTaP vaccine.

Conclusion.  All the studied DTaP vaccines performed similarly with regard to reactions, whether given as a fifth sequential dose of the same vaccine, a mix of different DTaP vaccines in the 5-dose sequence, or after 3 DTwP and 1 DTaP vaccinations. Large injection site reactions occurred more frequently after the fifth dose of DTaP than after the previous 4 doses. A fifth dose of all DTaP vaccines induced an antibody response to those antigens contained in the vaccine. No DTaP was consistently most or least reactogenic or immunogenic.  Key words:  acellular, adverse reactions, antibody, diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine, pertussis vaccine, whole cell, whooping cough.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
M. E. Pichichero, J. R. Casey, A. B. Francis, S. M. Marsocci, M. Murphy, W. Hoeger, and C. Cleary
Acellular Pertussis Vaccine Boosters Combined With Diphtheria and Tetanus Toxoid Boosters for Adolescents: Safety and Immunogenicity Assessment When Preceded by Different 5-Dose DTaP/DTwP Schedules
Clinical Pediatrics, September 1, 2006; 45(7): 613 - 620.
[Abstract] [PDF]