PEDIATRICS Vol. 105 No. 1 Supplement January 2000, pp. 246-249
A Trade-off Analysis of Routine Newborn Circumcision
Received Jun 9, 1999; accepted Sep 1, 1999.
,,, 
From the * Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington;
Child Health Institute, University of Washington; § Robert Wood
Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, University of Washington;
Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle,
Washington.
Background. The risks associated with newborn circumcision have not been as extensively evaluated as the benefits.
Objectives. The goals of this study were threefold: 1) to derive a population-based complication rate for newborn circumcision; 2) to calculate the number needed to harm for newborn circumcision based on this rate; and 3) to establish trade-offs based on our complication rates and published estimates of the benefits of circumcision including the prevention of urinary tract infections and penile cancer.
Methods. Using the Comprehensive Hospital Abstract Reporting System for Washington State, we retrospectively examined routine newborn circumcisions performed over 9 years (1987-1996). We used International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes to identify both circumcisions and complications and limited our analyses to children without other surgical procedures performed during their initial birth hospitalization.
Results. Of 354 297 male infants born during the study period, 130 475 (37%) were circumcised during their newborn stay. Overall 287 (.2%) of circumcised children and 33 (.01%) of uncircumcised children had complications potentially associated with circumcision coded as a discharge diagnosis. Based on our findings, a complication can be expected in 1 out every 476 circumcisions. Six urinary tract infections can be prevented for every complication endured and almost 2 complications can be expected for every case of penile cancer prevented.
Conclusions. Circumcision remains a relatively safe procedure. However, for some parents, the risks we report may outweigh the potential benefits. This information may help parents seeking guidance to make an informed decision. Key words: newborn circumcision, complications, urinary tract infections.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Facebook 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. A. R. Tobian, R. H. Gray, and T. C. Quinn Male Circumcision for the Prevention of Acquisition and Transmission of Sexually Transmitted Infections: The Case for Neonatal Circumcision Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, January 1, 2010; 164(1): 78 - 84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. T. Brady Newborn Circumcision: Routine or Not Routine, That Is the Question Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, January 1, 2010; 164(1): 94 - 96. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Andres Should newborns be circumcised?: NO Can Fam Physician, December 1, 2007; 53(12): 2097 - 2099. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Andres Faut-il circoncire les nouveau-nes?: NON Can Fam Physician, December 1, 2007; 53(12): 2101 - 2103. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. M. Fergusson, J. M. Boden, and L. J. Horwood Circumcision Status and Risk of Sexually Transmitted Infection in Young Adult Males: An Analysis of a Longitudinal Birth Cohort Pediatrics, November 1, 2006; 118(5): 1971 - 1977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. S Van Howe, J S. Svoboda, and F. M Hodges HIV infection and circumcision: cutting through the hyperbole Perspectives in Public Health, November 1, 2005; 125(6): 259 - 265. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. S. Van Howe A Cost-Utility Analysis of Neonatal Circumcision Med Decis Making, November 1, 2004; 24(6): 584 - 601. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Frank;, D. Harrison;, D. A. Christakis, E. Harvey, D. M. Zerr, C. Feudtner, J. A. Wright, and F. A. Connell A Trade-off Analysis of Routine Newborn Circumcision Pediatrics, October 1, 2000; 106(4): 954 - 954. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
