This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Daum, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Daum, R. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Infectious Disease & Immunity

PEDIATRICS Vol. 104 No. 6 December 1999, p. e69

ELECTRONIC ARTICLE:
Immunization Outreach in an Inner-City Housing Development: Reminder-Recall on Foot

Received Nov 10, 1998; accepted Jun 14, 1999.

Karen P. Goldstein*, Diane S. Lauderdale§, Cai Glushakparallel , James Walterparallel , and Robert S. DaumDagger

From the Sections of * General Pediatrics and Dagger  Infectious Diseases, the Department of Pediatrics; the § Department of Health Studies; and the parallel  Section of Emergency Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

Objective.  To determine rates of immunization coverage among children 3 to 72 months of age in a large public housing development, to develop a community-based outreach program to increase coverage, and to evaluate the effect of the program.

Design.  A door-to-door canvass of the development by specially trained emergency medical technicians to enroll families, to determine immunization status from written records, and to follow-up to encourage immunizations and well-child care. The program was evaluated, comparing rates of immunization by age with an expectation based on the immunization histories before enrollment.

Setting.  A Chicago public housing development, October 1993 through December 1996.

Outcome Variables.  Antigen-specific and series-specific coverage based on written records.

Results.  Of the caregivers, 92% were able to identify a primary care provider. At the time of enrollment, 37% of 1075 children were up-to-date, but that proportion varied by age with 27% of children 19 to 35 months of age being up-to-date. The program increased rates of immunization compared with the expectation from the preenrollment rates. At their final assessment, 50% of the children were up-to-date. For individual vaccines, there was a positive program effect. For example, before enrollment, 22% of children 15 months of age had received measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine. However, 39% of children who were enrolled in the program before they were 12 months of age had received their first immunizations by 15 months of age.

Conclusions.  Children in the housing development had very low rates of immunization before enrollment. An in-person intervention was effective in reaching families and determining immunization status. In the 3-year enrollment and observation period, rates of immunization increased.  Key words:  immunization rates, public housing, outreach intervention.