This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hammerschlag, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Laraque, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hammerschlag, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Laraque, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Infectious Disease & Immunity
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

PEDIATRICS Vol. 104 No. 5 November 1999, pp. 1137-1139

EXPERIENCE AND REASON:
Inappropriate Use of Nonculture Tests for the Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in Suspected Victims of Child Sexual Abuse: A Continuing Problem

Received Feb 16, 1999; accepted Apr 30, 1999.

Margaret R. Hammerschlag and Stephen Ajl

Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine State University of New York Health Sciences Center at Brooklyn Brooklyn, NY 11203-2098

Danielle Laraque

Department of Pediatrics College of Physicians and Surgeons Columbia University at Harlem Hospital Center New York, NY 10037

The introduction of nonculture tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis has revolutionized the management of chlamydial infections in sexually active adolescents and adults. However, these tests are insufficiently specific for use in genital and rectal sites in children; false-positive tests can be frequent. We report here 4 cases involving inappropriate use of nonculture tests in children in New York City during 1998. Two cases involved the use of enzyme immunoassays with vaginal specimens. In both cases the initial results were positive, however, cultures for C trachomatis performed later were negative. In the third case, the DNA probe test for C trachomatis was used. The fourth child was being evaluated for sexually transmitted diseases after rape. Although the pediatrician sent a rectal culture to a large commercial laboratory it was later determined that the laboratory was using an enzyme immunoassay for culture confirmation leading to a false-positive result. At the least the use of these inappropriate tests resulted in unnecessary retesting and at the worst, unnecessary hospitalization, erroneous reports of sexual abuse and possibly unjustified prosecution and incarceration. Because of the social and legal implications it is important that practitioners be aware of these recommendations and require that commercial laboratories adhere to approved C trachomatis culture methods.

 Key words:  Chlamydia trachomatis, sexual abuse, enzyme immunoassay, DNA probe test.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Pediatr. Rev.Home page
M. R. Hammerschlag
Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydia pneumoniae Infections in Children and Adolescents
Pediatr. Rev., February 1, 2004; 25(2): 43 - 51.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JWatch Women's HealthHome page
Nonculture Techniques Are Inappropriate for Chlamydia Testing in Girls
Journal Watch Women's Health, February 1, 2000; 2000(201): 2 - 2.
[Full Text]