PEDIATRICS Vol. 104 No. 4 October 1999, p. e47
Received Dec 31, 1998; accepted Apr 26, 1999.
,
,
, and
From the * Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Flourtown,
Pennsylvania; the
Retina Service and the § Cataract and Primary Eye
Care Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Jefferson Medical College,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and the
Epidemiology Unit, Massachusetts
Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Objective. Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a leading cause of adverse visual outcomes in premature infants. Both laser photocoagulation and cryotherapy have been demonstrated in clinical trials to be efficacious in reducing the incidence of visual loss occurring secondary to threshold ROP. Visual data recently have become available concerning the long-term clinical efficacy of both treatments, as have data concerning the utility value of visual states in general. Accordingly, we undertook an analysis to ascertain the cost-effectiveness of laser photocoagulation and cryotherapy in the treatment of threshold ROP.
Design. A computer simulation economic model is presented to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of cryotherapy and laser photocoagulation therapy, compared with the natural course of the disease, for treating premature infants with threshold ROP. The model applies long-term visual data from previous clinical trials, utility analysis, decision analysis, and economic principles, such as present value analysis, to account for the time value of money to arrive at a cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained.
Outcome Measures. Cost per QALY gained from laser therapy and cryotherapy.
Results. Laser photocoagulation therapy for threshold ROP costs $678 1998 US dollars (at a 3% discount rate to account for the time value of money) for each QALY gained from treatment. Cryotherapy for the same disease costs $1801 per QALY at a similar discount rate.
Conclusions. From the point of view of cost-effectiveness, laser therapy seems to have an advantage over cryotherapy for the treatment of threshold ROP. Key words: threshold retinopathy of prematurity, laser therapy, cryotherapy, cost-effectiveness.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. M. Jackson, K. E. Scott, J. Graff Zivin, D. A. Bateman, J. T. Flynn, J. D. Keenan, and M. F. Chiang Cost-Utility Analysis of Telemedicine and Ophthalmoscopy for Retinopathy of Prematurity Management Arch Ophthalmol, April 1, 2008; 126(4): 493 - 499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Sharma, G C Brown, M M Brown, H Hollands, R Robins, and G K Shah Validity of the time trade-off and standard gamble methods of utility assessment in retinal patients Br. J. Ophthalmol., May 1, 2002; 86(5): 493 - 496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M Brown, G. C Brown, S. Sharma, H. Hollands, and J. Landy Quality of life and systemic comorbidities in patients with ophthalmic disease Br. J. Ophthalmol., January 1, 2002; 86(1): 8 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||