PEDIATRICS Vol. 104 No. 3 September 1999, p. e33
Received Oct 29, 1998; accepted Feb 10, 1999.
,
, and
From the * Division of Epidemiology, Statistics and Prevention
Research, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland;
PricewaterhouseCoopers, Washington, DC; § Division of Health
Examination Statistics, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Maryland; and
Westat, Inc, Rockville, Maryland.
Objective. To compare young children
3 to 6 years of age who were born small-for-gestational age (SGA;
<10th percentile for gestational age) or large-for-gestational age
(LGA;
90th percentile) with those who were born
appropriate-for-gestational age (10th-89th percentile) to determine
whether there are differences in growth and fatness in early childhood
associated with birth weight status.
Design and Methods. National sample of 3192 US-born
non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, and Mexican-American children
3 to 6 years of age (36-83 months) examined in the third National
Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and for whom birth
certificates were obtained. On the birth certificates, length of
gestation from the mother's last menstrual period was examined for
completeness, validity, and whether the pattern of missing
(n = 141) and invalid data (n = 147) on gestation was random. Gestation was considered invalid when
>44 weeks, or when at gestations of
35 weeks, birth weight was
inconsistent with gestation. To reclaim cases with missing or invalid
data on gestation for analysis, a multiple imputation (MI) procedure
was used. MI procedures are recommended when, as in this case, a
critical covariate (length of gestation) is not missing at random, and
complete-subject analysis may be biased. Using the results of the MI
procedure, children were categorized, and growth outcome was assessed
by birth weight-for-gestational age status. The growth outcomes
considered in these analyses were body weight (kg), height (cm), head
circumference (cm), mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC; cm), and triceps
and subscapular skinfold thicknesses (mm). The anthropometric outcomes
first were transformed to approximate normal distributions and
converted into z scores (standard deviation units
[SDU]) to scale the data for comparison across ages. Outcomes at each
age then were estimated using regression procedures. SUDAAN software
that adjusts variance estimates to account for the sample design was
used in analysis for prevalence estimates and to calculate regression
coefficients (in SDU).
Results. Over these ages, children born SGA remained
significantly shorter and weighed less (
0.70 to
0.60 SDU). Children
born LGA remained taller and weighed more (0.40-0.60 SDU). For weight
and height among LGA children, there was a divergence from the mean with age compared with those born appropriate-for-gestational age
(10th-89th percentile). Head circumference and MUAC followed these
same patterns. The coefficients for MUAC show values for SGA children
fairly consistently at about
0.50 SDU and children born LGA show
increasing MUAC from +0.40 to +0.50 SDU from 36 to 83 months of age. As
with weight, there is a trend toward increased MUAC coefficients with
age. Measures of fatness (triceps and subscapular skinfolds), which are
more prone to environmental influences, showed less association with
birth weight-for-gestational age status. Only a single age group, the
oldest (6 years of age) group showed a significant deficit in fatness
for children born SGA. For children born LGA, there was an increase in
fatness at both the triceps and subscapular sites after 3 years of
age.
Conclusion. These findings on a national sample of US-born non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, and Mexican-American children show that children born SGA remain significantly shorter and lighter throughout early childhood and do not seem to catch up from 36 to 83 months of age. LGA infants remain longer and heavier through 83 months of age, but unlike children born SGA, children born LGA may be prone to an increasing accumulation of fat in early childhood. Thus, early childhood may be a particularly sensitive period in which there is increase in variation in levels of fatness associated with size at birth. These findings have implications for the evaluation of the growth of young children. The results indicate that intrauterine growth is associated with size in early childhood. Particularly, children born LGA may be at risk for accumulating excess fat at these ages. Birth weight status and gestational age may be useful in assembling a prognostic risk profile for children. Key words: blacks, birth weight, growth, large-for-gestational-age, multiple imputation, Mexican-Americans, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, small-for-gestational age, whites.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Karaolis-Danckert, A. E Buyken, K. Bolzenius, C. Perim de Faria, M. J Lentze, and A. Kroke Rapid growth among term children whose birth weight was appropriate for gestational age has a longer lasting effect on body fat percentage than on body mass index Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2006; 84(6): 1449 - 1455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L Hediger, M. D Overpeck, W J. Ruan, and J. F Troendle Early infant feeding and growth status of US-born infants and children aged 4-71 mo: analyses from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994 Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2000; 72(1): 159 - 167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||