This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peña, B. M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Mandl, K. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peña, B. M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Mandl, K. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surgery
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

PEDIATRICS Vol. 104 No. 3 September 1999, pp. 440-446

Effect of Computed Tomography on Patient Management and Costs in Children With Suspected Appendicitis

Received Oct 15, 1998; accepted Jan 12, 1999.

Barbara M. Garcia Peña*, George A. TaylorDagger , Dennis P. Lund§, and Kenneth D. Mandl*

From the * Department of Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine; the Dagger  Department of Radiology; and the § Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Objective.  Children evaluated in the emergency department for possible appendicitis are often admitted for observation, despite the widespread availability of accurate diagnostic studies, particularly computed tomography (CT). We sought to establish effective and efficient strategies for using CT to diagnose and manage children with possible appendicitis.

Design.  Retrospective chart review and decision analysis.

Setting.  Emergency department of a large, urban tertiary care pediatric teaching hospital.

Patients.  All patients admitted from January 1996 to August 1997 for suspected appendicitis.

Method of Analysis.  Three modeled strategies were empirically applied to the retrospective cohort of patients admitted for observation. Outcomes and costs under the modeled strategies were compared with those under current practice. The three strategies were: 1) to obtain CT scans on all patients and discharge those with normal findings; 2) to obtain CT scans and admit all patients; 3) to selectively obtain CT scans on those patients with a peripheral white blood cell count >10 000/mm3 (10 × 109/L) and admit all. The sensitivity and specificity of CT for diagnosing appendicitis were determined empirically from the data. A sensitivity analysis was performed.

Main Outcome Measures.  The number of preoperative inpatient observation days, total hospital costs, and the rates of both missed appendicitis and negative laparotomies.

Results.  Of 609 patients hospitalized for possible appendicitis, 287 went directly to the operating room and 14 patients had known perforation and abscess. Three hundred eight children were observed and comprised the study cohort. Of the cohort, 112 (36.4%) underwent appendectomy and 26 (23.2%) of these had a normal appendix at pathology. Three patients were discharged from the hospital after observation and were subsequently readmitted with appendicitis (missed appendicitis). Among the 75 patients who had CT performed, the sensitivity and specificity of CT were both 97%. Under the current practice strategy, the cohort collectively accumulated 487 inpatient observation days and incurred a per patient cost of $5831. All three CT strategies would have reduced the total number of inpatient observation days, operations, negative laparotomies, as well as the per patient cost. The strategy of obtaining CT scans on all patients and then admitting them had the lowest rate of missed appendicitis. The additional cost of preventing each case of missed appendicitis under this strategy compared with the strategy of obtaining CT scans and sending home those with negative findings was $150 304. Even at the lowest reported sensitivity and specificity of CT in the literature, the ordering of the three strategies remained constant and continued to reduce total cost per patient.

Conclusion.  Compared with current practice, diagnostic strategies using CT could reduce costs and improve diagnosis, management, and outcomes for children with appendicitis.  Key words:  computed tomography, patient management and costs, appendicitis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. J. Wan, M. Krahn, W. J. Ungar, E. Caku, L. Sung, L. S. Medina, and A. S. Doria
Acute Appendicitis in Young Children: Cost-effectiveness of US versus CT in Diagnosis--A Markov Decision Analytic Model
Radiology, February 1, 2009; 250(2): 378 - 386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. E. Jacobs
CT and Sonography for Suspected Acute Appendicitis: A Commentary.
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2006; 186(4): 1094 - 1096.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
A. B. Kharbanda, G. A. Taylor, S. J. Fishman, and R. G. Bachur
A Clinical Decision Rule to Identify Children at Low Risk for Appendicitis
Pediatrics, September 1, 2005; 116(3): 709 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
N. Pinto Leite, J. M. Pereira, R. Cunha, P. Pinto, and C. Sirlin
CT Evaluation of Appendicitis and Its Complications: Imaging Techniques and Key Diagnostic Findings
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2005; 185(2): 406 - 417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
A. M. Kosloske, C. L. Love, J. E. Rohrer, J. F. Goldthorn, and S. R. Lacey
The Diagnosis of Appendicitis in Children: Outcomes of a Strategy Based on Pediatric Surgical Evaluation
Pediatrics, January 1, 2004; 113(1): 29 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
C. B. Forrest, S. A. Shipman, D. Dougherty, and M. R. Miller
Outcomes Research in Pediatric Settings: Recent Trends and Future Directions
Pediatrics, January 1, 2003; 111(1): 171 - 178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. J. Callahan, D. P. Rodriguez, and G. A. Taylor
CT of Appendicitis in Children
Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 325 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Macari, J. Hines, E. Balthazar, and A. Megibow
Mesenteric Adenitis: CT Diagnosis of Primary Versus Secondary Causes, Incidence, and Clinical Significance in Pediatric and Adult Patients
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2002; 178(4): 853 - 858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. E. Applegate, C. J. Sivit, A. E. Salvator, V. J. Borisa, D. L. Dudgeon, A. E. Stallion, and E. R. Grisoni
Effect of Cross-sectional Imaging on Negative Appendectomy and Perforation Rates in Children
Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 103 - 107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. E. Singer and K. E. Applegate
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Radiology
Radiology, June 1, 2001; 219(3): 611 - 620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. Lawrence;, B. M. Garcia Peña, G. A. Taylor, D. P. Lund, and K. D. Mandl
Computed Tomography in Diagnosing Suspected Appendicitis
Pediatrics, May 1, 2001; 107(5): 1231b - 1231.
[Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. J. Brenner, C. D. Elliston, E. J. Hall, and W. E. Berdon
Estimated Risks of Radiation-Induced Fatal Cancer from Pediatric CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 289 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. E. Mullins, M. F. Kircher, D. P. Ryan, D. Doody, T. C. Mullins, J. T. Rhea, and R. A. Novelline
Evaluation of Suspected Appendicitis in Children Using Limited Helical CT and Colonic Contrast Material
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2001; 176(1): 37 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
C. J. Sivit, M. J. Siegel, K. E. Applegate, and K. D. Newman
When Appendicitis Is Suspected in Children
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2001; 21(1): 247 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
B. M. Garcia Peña, G. A. Taylor, S. J. Fishman, and K. D. Mandl
Costs and Effectiveness of Ultrasonography and Limited Computed Tomography for Diagnosing Appendicitis in Children
Pediatrics, October 1, 2000; 106(4): 672 - 676.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JWatch Emergency Med.Home page
CT Useful in Diagnosis of Childhood Appendicitis
Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, November 1, 1999; 1999(1101): 3 - 3.
[Full Text]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
CT As a Diagnostic Tool for Appendicitis
Journal Watch (General), September 24, 1999; 1999(924): 3 - 3.
[Full Text]


Home page
JAMAHome page
B. M. G. Pena, K. D. Mandl, S. J. Kraus, A. C. Fischer, G. R. Fleisher, D. P. Lund, and G. A. Taylor
Ultrasonography and Limited Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis and Management of Appendicitis in Children
JAMA, September 15, 1999; 282(11): 1041 - 1046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. H. Lowe, K. S. Draud, M. Hernanz-Schulman, M. R. Newton, R. M. Heller, S. M. Stein, and T. Speroff
Nonenhanced Limited CT in Children Suspected of Having Appendicitis: Prospective Comparison of Attending and Resident Interpretations
Radiology, December 1, 2001; 221(3): 755 - 759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]