PEDIATRICS Vol. 104 No. 2 August 1999, pp. 249-257
Restraining Orders: A Frequent Marker of Adverse Maternal Health
Received Nov 16, 1998; accepted Feb 16, 1999.
,
From the * Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics
and the Department of Pediatrics, Boston University School of
Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Objective. Women with histories of interpersonal violence are poorly identified because of barriers in self-disclosure. This study identified differences on maternal health and child behavior between women who report filing a restraining order (RO) and those who do not among a nonreferred sample of women living in high-crime neighborhoods.
Methods. During a maternal interview mothers were asked whether they ever filed a RO, the victim/defendant relationship, the number of times, and the year of the filing. Four types of violence were coded independently based on maternal narratives: verbal harassment, verbal threats or intimidation, physical assault, and destruction of property. We controlled for differences between RO and non-RO groups regarding demographic background, partner characteristics, other types of maternal past victimization, and use of alcohol and illicit drugs. Outcomes for mothers include partner aggression (Conflict Tactics Scale-R), perception of health and bodily pain (SF-36 Health Survey), distress symptoms (SCL90-R), posttraumatic stress (PTS)-related symptoms, and partial posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnosis (modified Diagnostic Interview Schedule PTSD-Module). Outcomes for the child include partner aggression (Conflict Tactic Scale-R), behavior problems (CBC 2-3 or Child Behavior Checklist), and PTS-related symptoms (PTS-related symptom checklist).
Patients. One hundred sixty patients between 3.0 to 6.1 years who resided within five residential ZIP codes with a high rate of local crime in the City of Boston were drawn from a pediatric care clinic practice. Patients were participants of a larger study about the impact of community violence on mother-child relations.
Results. Sixty-four (40%) of 160 mothers reported a history of filing a RO against a current boyfriend or husband (39%), ex-boyfriend or husband (44%), someone known (8%), or other (9%), with a mean of 3.9 years (standard deviation = 3.5 years) since RO filing. After controlling for covariates of marital status, immigrant status, public assistance, and lifetime sexual victimization, we found a significant multivariate analysis of covariance group effect on maternal outcomes. Analysis of covariance analyses indicated that mothers in the RO group experienced higher current partner verbal aggression and physical violence to mother, poorer health, and higher PTS-related symptoms, compared with mothers in the non-RO group. More mothers in the RO group met partial lifetime PTSD diagnosis. Unadjusted for maternal covariates, the multivariate analysis of variance analyses on child outcomes (partner aggression to child, behavior problems, and PTS-related symptoms) indicated a nonsignificant group effect.
Conclusions. Among dyads residing in high-risk crime areas, the incidence of RO histories is substantive considering this was a nonshelter, nonreferred sample. The inquiry about the history of a RO may provide a new and efficient marker to quality of current partner relationship, maternal health, and maternal stress-related symptomatology. Key words: interpersonal violence, restraining orders, maternal health, child problems, high-crime neighborhoods.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Facebook 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. L. Postmus Challenging the Negative Assumptions Surrounding Civil Protection Orders: A Guide for Advocates Affilia, November 1, 2007; 22(4): 347 - 356. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. B. Phelan Screening for Intimate Partner Violence in Medical Settings Trauma Violence Abuse, April 1, 2007; 8(2): 199 - 213. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. B. Sorenson and H. Shen Restraining Orders in California: A Look at Statewide Data Violence Against Women, July 1, 2005; 11(7): 912 - 933. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. E. Jordan Intimate Partner Violence and the Justice System: An Examination of the Interface J Interpers Violence, December 1, 2004; 19(12): 1412 - 1434. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. B. Mechanic Beyond PTSD: Mental Health Consequences of Violence Against Women: A Response to Briere and Jordan J Interpers Violence, November 1, 2004; 19(11): 1283 - 1289. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. L. Pulido and D. Gupta Protecting the Child and the Family: Integrating Domestic Violence Screening Into a Child Advocacy Center Violence Against Women, August 1, 2002; 8(8): 917 - 933. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Maman, J. K. Mbwambo, N. M. Hogan, G. P. Kilonzo, J. C. Campbell, E. Weiss, and M. D. Sweat HIV-Positive Women Report More Lifetime Partner Violence: Findings From a Voluntary Counseling and Testing Clinic in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Am J Public Health, August 1, 2002; 92(8): 1331 - 1337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. W. BARNETT Why Battered Women Do Not Leave, Part 2: External Inhibiting Factors--Social Support and Internal Inhibiting Factors Trauma Violence Abuse, January 1, 2001; 2(1): 3 - 35. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Uncovering Domestic Violence: Ask About Restraining Orders Journal Watch Women's Health, November 1, 1999; 1999(1101): 18 - 18. [Full Text]
|
|
