This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Birken, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Parkin, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Birken, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Parkin, P. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice

PEDIATRICS Vol. 103 No. 5 May 1999, pp. 941-947

In Which Journals Will Pediatricians Find the Best Evidence for Clinical Practice?

Catherine S. Birken* and Patricia C. Parkin*, Dagger

From the * Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine; and the Dagger  Division of Pediatric Medicine, the Hospital for Sick Children, and the Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Objective.  The objective of this study was to identify the journals that contain the best evidence relating to clinical pediatric practice, thus enabling general pediatricians and pediatric trainees to identify the best quality evidence more efficiently and to select journals for general reading more judiciously.

Methods.  In the first of three strategies, journal citations from completed systematic reviews using topic headings of pediatric(s), child, infant(s), newborn, neonate(s), neonatology, and adolescent(s) in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) in the 1997, Issue 4, Cochrane Library were collected. In the second strategy, journal citations from American Academy of Pediatrics' (AAP) policy statements from 1994 to 1996 found in the AAP policy reference guide were collected. In the third strategy, journal citations from the Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) statements from 1990 to 1997 found in Pediatrics and Child Health were collected. Topics related to tertiary neonatology, nonphysician health care professionals, public health policy, ethics, and nonjournal citation sources were excluded. All statements with no references were excluded. Journal citations in CDSR with no pediatric subjects and citation of AAP policy statements cited in AAP policy statements were excluded. The number of citations from the journal cited most frequently, from journals that represented ~10% of all citations and from the 10 journals cited most frequently were expressed as a percent of total citations and a 95% CI was calculated.

Results.  Using all three strategies (CDSR, AAP, and CPS), the journal cited most frequently was Pediatrics. Using the CDSR strategy (n = 234), citations from Pediatrics represented 6.0% of the total (95% CI: 3.0%, 9.0%), using the AAP strategy (n = 930), citations from Pediatrics represented 11.4% of the total (95% CI: 9.4%, 13.4%), and using the CPS strategy (n = 873), citations from Pediatrics represented 11.9% of the total (95% CI: 9.8, 14.1). Using the CDSR strategy, citations from the 10 journals cited most frequently made up 38.9% of the total citations (95% CI: 32.7%, 45.1%), using the AAP strategy, citations from the 10 journals cited most frequently made up 42.3% of the total citations (95% CI: 39.3%, 45.3%), and using the CPS strategy, citations from the 10 journals cited most frequently made up 60.6% of the total citations (95% CI: 57.4, 63.8). In the CPS strategy, citations from the Journal of Pediatrics represented 10.2% of the total citations (95% CI: 8.2, 12.2) and citations from New England Journal of Medicine represented 9.5% of the total citations (95% CI: 7.6, 11.5). A total of 7 journals were found to be among the 10 cited most frequently using all three strategies (in alphabetical order): Archives of Diseases in Childhood, British Medical Journal, Journal of the American Medical Association, Journal of Pediatrics, Lancet, New England Journal of Medicine, and Pediatrics.

Conclusions.  This study provides the general pediatrician and pediatric trainee with a strategy to identify efficiently a significant proportion of the best evidence on pediatric practice by restricting searches and reading to a limited number of journals. It also highlights the fact that the best quality evidence on pediatric practice is found in a large number of medical journals.  Key words:  evidence-based medicine, medical education, clinical pediatrics, information services, bibliometrics.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
J. B. Wolf
Is Breast Really Best? Risk and Total Motherhood in the National Breastfeeding Awareness Campaign
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, August 1, 2007; 32(4): 595 - 636.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
J. F. Standing, Z. F. Khaki, and I. C. K. Wong
Poor Formulation Information in Published Pediatric Drug Trials
Pediatrics, October 1, 2005; 116(4): e559 - e562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
R. C. Sneed, W. L. May, and C. Stencel
Policy Versus Practice: Comparison of Prescribing Therapy and Durable Medical Equipment in Medical and Educational Settings
Pediatrics, November 1, 2004; 114(5): e612 - e625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
F A I Riordan, E M Boyle, and B Phillips
Best paediatric evidence; is it accessible and used on-call?
Arch. Dis. Child., May 1, 2004; 89(5): 469 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Pediatr. Rev.Home page
G. Onady and M. A. Raslich
Evidence-based Medicine for the Pediatrician
Pediatr. Rev., September 1, 2002; 23(9): 318 - 322.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
K. P. Lee, M. Schotland, P. Bacchetti, and L. A. Bero
Association of Journal Quality Indicators With Methodological Quality of Clinical Research Articles
JAMA, June 5, 2002; 287(21): 2805 - 2808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
B. Gastel
Assessing the impact of investigators' work: beyond impact factors/Evaluer l'influence des travaux de recherche au dela des facteurs d'impact
Can J Anesth, November 1, 2001; 48(10): 941 - 945.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
T. Bartman;, R. Frank;, J. M. Goldenring;, C. J. Cold, M. R. Storms;, N. Sethi, K. Schwierling, J. Kim, K. Phelan, J. Minzner, et al.
Newborn Circumcision and Urinary Tract Infections
Pediatrics, January 1, 2001; 107(1): 210b - 214.
[Full Text]

Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
F A I Riordan
Short report: Do presenters to paediatric meetings get their work published?
Arch. Dis. Child., December 1, 2000; 83(6): 524 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
H. MARCOVITCH
Malcolm Chiswick leaves Archives
Arch. Dis. Child., January 1, 2000; 82(1): 1 - 1.
[Full Text]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
H. Bauchner
Evidence-based Medicine: A New Science or an Epidemiologic Fad?
Pediatrics, May 1, 1999; 103(5): 1029 - 1031.
[Full Text]