PEDIATRICS Vol. 103 No. 4 April 1999, pp. 772-777
Primary Prevention of Childhood Lead Exposure: A Randomized Trial of Dust Control
Received Jul 6, 1998; accepted Sep 7, 1998.
,,,,, and
From the * Children's Hospital Medical Center and the
Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio;
and the Departments of Pediatrics and § Biostatistics at the
University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester,
New York.
Background. Dust control is recommended as one of the primary strategies to prevent or control children's exposure to residential lead hazards, but the effect of dust control on children's blood lead levels is poorly understood.
Objective. To determine the effectiveness of dust control in preventing children's exposure to lead, as measured by blood lead levels, during their peak age of susceptibility.
Design. A randomized, controlled trial.
Setting. Rochester, NY.
Participants. A total of 275 urban children were randomized at 6 months of age, of whom 246 (90%) were available for the 24-month-old follow-up visit.
Interventions. Children and their families were randomly assigned to an intervention group (n = 140), which received cleaning equipment and up to eight visits by a dust control advisor, or a control group (n = 135).
Outcome Measures. Geometric mean blood lead levels and prevalence of elevated blood lead levels (ie, >10 µg/dL, 15 µg/dL, and 20 µg/dL).
Results. At baseline, children's geometric mean blood
lead levels were 2.9 µg/dL (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.7, 3.1); there were no significant differences in characteristics or lead
exposure by group assignment, with the exception of water lead levels. For children in the intervention group, the mean number of visits by a
dust control advisor during the 18-month study period was 6.2;
51 (36%) had 4 to 7 visits, and 69 (49%) had 8 visits. At 24 months
of age, the geometric mean blood lead was 7.3 µg/dL (95% CI = 6.6, 8.2) for the intervention group and 7.8 µg/dL (95% CI = 6.9, 8.7) for the control group. The percentage of children with
a 24-month blood lead 
10 µg/dL, 15 µg/dL, and 20 µg/dL was
31% versus 36%, 12% versus 14%, and 5% versus 7% in the
intervention and control groups, respectively.
Conclusions. We conclude that dust control, as performed by families and in the absence of lead hazard controls to reduce ongoing contamination from lead-based paint, is not effective in the primary prevention of childhood lead exposure.blood lead, lead-contaminated house dust, randomized trial, children, environmental exposure, lead poisoning, primary prevention, prevention. .
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  H. J. Binns, C. Campbell, M. J. Brown, and for the Advisory Committee on Childhood Lead Poiso Interpreting and Managing Blood Lead Levels of Less Than 10 {micro}g/dL in Children and Reducing Childhood Exposure to Lead: Recommendations of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Advisory Committee on Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Pediatrics, November 1, 2007; 120(5): e1285 - e1298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Rischitelli, P. Nygren, C. Bougatsos, M. Freeman, and M. Helfand Screening for Elevated Lead Levels in Childhood and Pregnancy: An Updated Summary of Evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force Pediatrics, December 1, 2006; 118(6): e1867 - e1895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. M. Jordan, P. A. Lee, R. Hampton, and P. L. Pirie Recommendations from Lead Poisoning Prevention Program Participants: Best Practices Health Promot Pract, October 1, 2004; 5(4): 429 - 437. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. C. Kegler and L. H. Malcoe Results From a Lay Health Advisor Intervention to Prevent Lead Poisoning Among Rural Native American Children Am J Public Health, October 1, 2004; 94(10): 1730 - 1735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. A. ozden, H. Issever, G. Gokcay, and G. Saner Longitudinal Analyses of Blood-Lead Levels and Risk Factors for Lead Poisoning in Healthy Children under Two Years of Age Indoor and Built Environment, August 1, 2004; 13(4): 303 - 308. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. J. Brown and P. J. Meehan HEALTH EFFECTS OF BLOOD LEAD LEVELS LOWER THAN 10 MG/DL IN CHILDREN Am J Public Health, January 1, 2004; 94(1): 8 - 9. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. R. Neuspiel Lead Levels Under 10 Micrograms per Deciliter Are Hazardous AAP Grand Rounds, July 1, 2003; 10(1): 1 - 2. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. L. Canfield, C. R. Henderson Jr., D. A. Cory-Slechta, C. Cox, T. A. Jusko, and B. P. Lanphear Intellectual Impairment in Children with Blood Lead Concentrations below 10 {micro}g per Deciliter N. Engl. J. Med., April 17, 2003; 348(16): 1517 - 1526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. P. Lanphear, S. Eberly, and C. R. Howard Long-Term Effect of Dust Control on Blood Lead Concentrations Pediatrics, October 1, 2000; 106(4): 48e - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Other Articles Noted Evid. Based Nurs., October 1, 1999; 2(4): 105 - 112. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Does Dust Control Really Prevent Lead Poisoning? Journal Watch (General), April 20, 1999; 1999(420): 5 - 5. [Full Text]
|
|
